203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17400759)
1. Diagnosis of articular cartilage abnormalities of the knee: prospective clinical evaluation of a 3D water-excitation true FISP sequence.
Duc SR; Koch P; Schmid MR; Horger W; Hodler J; Pfirrmann CW
Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):475-82. PubMed ID: 17400759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Articular cartilage defects detected with 3D water-excitation true FISP: prospective comparison with sequences commonly used for knee imaging.
Duc SR; Pfirrmann CW; Schmid MR; Zanetti M; Koch PP; Kalberer F; Hodler J
Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):216-23. PubMed ID: 17717327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Internal knee derangement assessed with 3-minute three-dimensional isovoxel true FISP MR sequence: preliminary study.
Duc SR; Pfirrmann CW; Koch PP; Zanetti M; Hodler J
Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):526-35. PubMed ID: 18227545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of 3D vs. 2D fast spin echo imaging for evaluation of articular cartilage in the knee on a 3T system scientific research.
Milewski MD; Smitaman E; Moukaddam H; Katz LD; Essig DA; Medvecky MJ; Haims AH
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1637-43. PubMed ID: 21683539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 3.0-T evaluation of knee cartilage by using three-dimensional IDEAL GRASS imaging: comparison with fast spin-echo imaging.
Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Woods MA; Shinki K; De Smet AA; Reeder SB
Radiology; 2010 Apr; 255(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 20173102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective comparison of 3D FIESTA versus fat-suppressed 3D SPGR MRI in evaluating knee cartilage lesions.
Li X; Yu C; Wu H; Daniel K; Hu D; Xia L; Pan C; Xu A; Hu J; Wang L; Peng W; Li F
Clin Radiol; 2009 Oct; 64(10):1000-8. PubMed ID: 19748006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla.
Welsch GH; Zak L; Mamisch TC; Resinger C; Marlovits S; Trattnig S
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Synthetic-echo time postprocessing technique for generating images with variable T2-weighted contrast: diagnosis of meniscal and cartilage abnormalities of the knee.
Andreisek G; White LM; Theodoropoulos JS; Naraghi A; Young N; Zhao CY; Mamisch TC; Sussman MS
Radiology; 2010 Jan; 254(1):188-99. PubMed ID: 20032152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cartilaginous defects of the femorotibial joint: accuracy of coronal short inversion time inversion-recovery MR sequence.
Jungius KP; Schmid MR; Zanetti M; Hodler J; Koch P; Pfirrmann CW
Radiology; 2006 Aug; 240(2):482-8. PubMed ID: 16801363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy.
Disler DG; McCauley TR; Wirth CR; Fuchs MD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):377-82. PubMed ID: 7618561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differentiation between grade 3 and grade 4 articular cartilage defects of the knee: fat-suppressed proton density-weighted versus fat-suppressed three-dimensional gradient-echo MRI.
Lee SY; Jee WH; Kim SK; Koh IJ; Kim JM
Acta Radiol; 2010 May; 51(4):455-61. PubMed ID: 20350249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of cartilage surface injuries using 3D-double echo steady state (3D-DESS): effect of changing flip angle from 40° to 90°.
Moriya S; Miki Y; Kanagaki M; Yamamoto A; Okudaira S; Nakamura S; Yokobayashi T; Ishikawa M
Acta Radiol; 2011 Dec; 52(10):1138-42. PubMed ID: 22042983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MR arthrography of the hip: diagnostic performance of a dedicated water-excitation 3D double-echo steady-state sequence to detect cartilage lesions.
Knuesel PR; Pfirrmann CW; Noetzli HP; Dora C; Zanetti M; Hodler J; Kuehn B; Schmid MR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Dec; 183(6):1729-35. PubMed ID: 15547220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the articular cartilage of the knee joint: value of adding a T2 mapping sequence to a routine MR imaging protocol.
Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Munoz Del Rio A; Baer GS; Graf BK
Radiology; 2013 May; 267(2):503-13. PubMed ID: 23297335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of 1.5- and 3.0-T MR imaging for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee joint.
Kijowski R; Blankenbaker DG; Davis KW; Shinki K; Kaplan LD; De Smet AA
Radiology; 2009 Mar; 250(3):839-48. PubMed ID: 19164121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR arthrography of acetabular cartilage delamination in femoroacetabular cam impingement.
Pfirrmann CW; Duc SR; Zanetti M; Dora C; Hodler J
Radiology; 2008 Oct; 249(1):236-41. PubMed ID: 18682585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Articular cartilage and labral lesions of the glenohumeral joint: diagnostic performance of 3D water-excitation true FISP MR arthrography.
Dietrich TJ; Zanetti M; Saupe N; Pfirrmann CW; Fucentese SF; Hodler J
Skeletal Radiol; 2010 May; 39(5):473-80. PubMed ID: 20016888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients.
Bredella MA; Tirman PF; Peterfy CG; Zarlingo M; Feller JF; Bost FW; Belzer JP; Wischer TK; Genant HK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Apr; 172(4):1073-80. PubMed ID: 10587150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy.
Disler DG; McCauley TR; Kelman CG; Fuchs MD; Ratner LM; Wirth CR; Hospodar PP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):127-32. PubMed ID: 8659356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Grading articular cartilage of the knee using fast spin-echo proton density-weighted MR imaging without fat suppression.
Sonin AH; Pensy RA; Mulligan ME; Hatem S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Nov; 179(5):1159-66. PubMed ID: 12388492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
