166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1740198)
1. Intrauterine insemination outperforms intracervical insemination in a randomized, controlled study with frozen, donor semen.
Patton PE; Burry KA; Thurmond A; Novy MJ; Wolf DP
Fertil Steril; 1992 Mar; 57(3):559-64. PubMed ID: 1740198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of intracervical, intrauterine, and intratubal techniques for donor insemination.
Hurd WW; Randolph JF; Ansbacher R; Menge AC; Ohl DA; Brown AN
Fertil Steril; 1993 Feb; 59(2):339-42. PubMed ID: 8425628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of intrauterine versus intracervical insemination in fertile single women.
Carroll N; Palmer JR
Fertil Steril; 2001 Apr; 75(4):656-60. PubMed ID: 11287014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intrauterine insemination or intracervical insemination with cryopreserved donor sperm in the natural cycle: a cohort study.
Kop PA; van Wely M; Mol BW; de Melker AA; Janssens PM; Arends B; Curfs MH; Kortman M; Nap A; Rijnders E; Roovers JP; Ruis H; Simons AH; Repping S; van der Veen F; Mochtar MH
Hum Reprod; 2015 Mar; 30(3):603-7. PubMed ID: 25637621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective randomized comparison of intrauterine and intracervical insemination with donor spermatozoa.
Wainer R; Merlet F; Ducot B; Bailly M; Tribalat S; Lombroso R
Hum Reprod; 1995 Nov; 10(11):2919-22. PubMed ID: 8747045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intrauterine insemination-ready versus conventional semen cryopreservation for donor insemination: a comparison of retrospective results and a prospective, randomized trial.
Wolf DP; Patton PE; Burry KA; Kaplan PF
Fertil Steril; 2001 Jul; 76(1):181-5. PubMed ID: 11438340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective randomized study of pregnancy rates following intrauterine and intracervical insemination using frozen donor sperm.
Byrd W; Bradshaw K; Carr B; Edman C; Odom J; Ackerman G
Fertil Steril; 1990 Mar; 53(3):521-7. PubMed ID: 2307249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intrauterine insemination with frozen sperm increases pregnancy rates in donor insemination cycles under gonadotropin stimulation.
Matorras R; Gorostiaga A; Diez J; Corcóstegui B; Pijoan JI; Ramón O; Rodriguez-Escudero FJ
Fertil Steril; 1996 Mar; 65(3):620-5. PubMed ID: 8774298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does intrauterine insemination offer an advantage to cervical cap insemination in a donor insemination program?
Williams DB; Moley KH; Cholewa C; Odem RR; Willand J; Gast MJ
Fertil Steril; 1995 Feb; 63(2):295-8. PubMed ID: 7843434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Intrauterine and intracervical insemination with frozen donor semen. A comparative study].
Westergaard LG
Ugeskr Laeger; 1991 Sep; 153(38):2621-3. PubMed ID: 1949268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of intrauterine and intracervical insemination with frozen donor sperm: a meta-analysis.
Goldberg JM; Mascha E; Falcone T; Attaran M
Fertil Steril; 1999 Nov; 72(5):792-5. PubMed ID: 10560979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical insemination versus intra-uterine insemination of donor sperm for subfertility.
Besselink DE; Farquhar C; Kremer JA; Marjoribanks J; O'Brien P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2008 Apr; (2):CD000317. PubMed ID: 18425862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Should an intrauterine insemination with donor semen be performed 1 or 2 days after the spontaneous LH rise? A prospective RCT.
Blockeel C; Knez J; Polyzos NP; De Vos M; Camus M; Tournaye H
Hum Reprod; 2014 Apr; 29(4):697-703. PubMed ID: 24549212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Randomized controlled trial of cervical cap with intracervical reservoir versus standard intracervical injection to inseminate cryopreserved donor semen.
Coulson C; McLaughlin EA; Harris S; Ford WC; Hull MG
Hum Reprod; 1996 Jan; 11(1):84-7. PubMed ID: 8671164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of semen quality scores to predict pregnancy rates in couples undergoing intrauterine insemination with donor sperm.
Allamaneni SS; Bandaranayake I; Agarwal A
Fertil Steril; 2004 Sep; 82(3):606-11. PubMed ID: 15374703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative evaluation of intracervical and intrauterine routes in donor therapeutic insemination.
Patton PE; Burry KA; Novy MJ; Wolf DP
Hum Reprod; 1990 Apr; 5(3):263-5. PubMed ID: 2351707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A prospective, randomized, cross-over comparison of two methods of artificial insemination by donor on the incidence of conception: intracervical insemination by straw versus cervical cap.
Flierman PA; Hogerzeil HV; Hemrika DJ
Hum Reprod; 1997 Sep; 12(9):1945-8. PubMed ID: 9363712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Donor sperm insemination cycles: are two inseminations better than one?
Chavkin DE; Molinaro TA; Roe AH; Sammel MD; Dokras A
J Androl; 2012; 33(3):375-80. PubMed ID: 21636733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Therapeutic donor insemination: a prospective randomized trial of fresh versus frozen sperm.
Subak LL; Adamson GD; Boltz NL
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jun; 166(6 Pt 1):1597-604; discussion 1604-6. PubMed ID: 1615966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Is the limitation to 6 cycles of insemination with donor sperm justified?].
Le Lannou D
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2002 Feb; 30(2):129-32. PubMed ID: 11910881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
