122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17402222)
1. [Procuste cephalometry].
Penin X
Orthod Fr; 2006 Dec; 77(4):407-15. PubMed ID: 17402222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability and the smallest detectable differences of lateral cephalometric measurements.
Damstra J; Huddleston Slater JJ; Fourie Z; Ren Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):546.e1-8; discussion 546-7. PubMed ID: 21055590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The mandibular response in Class II malocclusions correction.
Cordua T; Deli R; Giuliante L; Ursini R
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(3):31-9. PubMed ID: 22031992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Craniofacial parameters of Syrian children with β-thalassemia major.
Takriti M; Dashash M
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 May; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 25426607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic model of anterior open bite--a new way to predict skeletal type: a cross-sectional study.
Urzal V; Braga AC; Ferreira AP
Int Orthod; 2014 Sep; 12(3):358-70. PubMed ID: 25087172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cephalometric floating norms as a guide toward a harmonious individual craniofacial pattern among Filipinos.
Sevilla-Naranjilla MA; Rudzki-Janson I
Angle Orthod; 2009 Nov; 79(6):1162-8. PubMed ID: 19852610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A three-dimensional cephalometric analysis.
Cho HJ
J Clin Orthod; 2009 Apr; 43(4):235-52, discussion 235; quiz 273. PubMed ID: 19458456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A three-dimensional comparison of a morphometric and conventional cephalometric midsagittal planes for craniofacial asymmetry.
Damstra J; Fourie Z; De Wit M; Ren Y
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):285-94. PubMed ID: 21271348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation between 3-dimensional facial morphology and mandibular movement during maximum mouth opening and closing.
Kim DS; Choi SC; Lee SS; Heo MS; Huh KH; Hwang SJ; Yi WJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Nov; 110(5):648-56. PubMed ID: 20955952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Craniofacial morphology in pediatric patients with persistent obstructive sleep apnea with or without positive airway pressure therapy: a cross-sectional cephalometric comparison with controls.
Korayem MM; Witmans M; MacLean J; Heo G; El-Hakim H; Flores-Mir C; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul; 144(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 23810049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Craniofacial morphology and inclination of the posterior slope of the articular eminence in female patients with and without condylar bone change.
Estomaguio GA; Yamada K; Ochi K; Hayashi T; Hanada K
Cranio; 2005 Oct; 23(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 16353465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An assessment of skeletal craniofacial asymmetry in South Indian population.
Taneja VK; Kumar GA; Farishta S; Minocha RC; Baiju G; Gopal D
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jan; 13(1):80-4. PubMed ID: 22430699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cranial base angulation in Brazilian patients seeking orthodontic treatment.
Alves PV; Mazuchelli J; Patel PK; Bolognese AM
J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 19(2):334-8. PubMed ID: 18362708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of soft and hard tissue profiles of orthognathic surgery patients treated recently and 20 years earlier.
Papadopoulos MA; Lazaridou-Terzoudi T; Øland J; Athanasiou AE; Melsen B
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jul; 108(1):e8-13. PubMed ID: 19540447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of hand-traced and computer-based cephalometric superimpositions.
Huja SS; Grubaugh EL; Rummel AM; Fields HW; Beck FM
Angle Orthod; 2009 May; 79(3):428-35. PubMed ID: 19413396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The displacement of craniofacial reference landmarks during puberty: a comparison of three superimposition methods.
Arat ZM; Rübendüz M; Akgül AA
Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 12940557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Superimposition and structural analysis.
Schudy F
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Feb; 109(2):180-92. PubMed ID: 8638568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in mandibular position in treated Class II division 2 malocclusions in growing and non-growing subjects.
AL-Nimri K; Abo-Zomor M; Alomari S
Aust Orthod J; 2016 May; 32(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 27468594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bimaxillary surgery in Class III malocclusion: soft and hard tissue changes.
Aydil B; Özer N; Marşan G
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 41(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 23182267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
