These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17402222)

  • 21. Effects of orthodontic intermaxillary class III mechanics on craniofacial structures. Part II - computerized cephalometrics.
    de Alba y Levy JA; Chaconas SJ; Caputo AA
    Angle Orthod; 1979 Jan; 49(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 283707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Centroid analysis of twin-block appliance treatment for Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Trenouth MJ
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 16779975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dentocraniofacial morphology of 12 Japanese subjects with unilateral cleft lip and palate with a severe Class III malocclusion: a cephalometric study at the pretreatment stage of surgical orthodontic treatment.
    Tateishi C; Moriyama K; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2001 Nov; 38(6):597-605. PubMed ID: 11681993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cranial base features in skeletal Class III patients.
    Proff P; Will F; Bokan I; Fanghänel J; Gedrange T
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):433-9. PubMed ID: 18416608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Longitudinal observation of mandibular motion pattern in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion subsequent to orthognathic surgery.
    Wen-Ching Ko E; Huang CS; Lo LJ; Chen YR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):e158-68. PubMed ID: 22260918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Craniofacial morphology characteristics of operated unilateral complete cleft lip and palate patients in mixed dentition.
    Liu R; Lu D; Wamalwa P; Li C; Hu H; Zou S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Dec; 112(6):e16-25. PubMed ID: 21831675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Molar heights and incisor inclinations in adults with Class II and Class III skeletal open-bite malocclusions.
    Arriola-Guillén LE; Flores-Mir C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 24582024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Visualization of individual growth-related craniofacial changes based on cephalometric landmark data: a pilot study.
    Lux CJ; Starke J; Rübel J; Stellzig A; Komposch G
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2002 May; 39(3):341-52. PubMed ID: 12019012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Over-bite and vertical changes following first premolar extraction in high angle cases.
    Ramesh GC; Pradeep MC; Kumar GA; Girish KS; Suresh BS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):812-8. PubMed ID: 23404008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clarifying the mechanism of effect of the Bionator for treatment of maxillary protrusion: A percentile growth study.
    Oda H; Sandou M; Lin CM; Kamata M; Kawata T
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):213-219. PubMed ID: 27759410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The variability of some craniofacial dimensions.
    Kerr WJ; Ford I
    Angle Orthod; 1991; 61(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 1928822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Landmark identification error in posterior anterior cephalometrics.
    Major PW; Johnson DE; Hesse KL; Glover KE
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(6):447-54. PubMed ID: 7864466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Gender differences in dentofacial characteristics of adult patients with temporomandibular disc displacement.
    Kwon HB; Kim H; Jung WS; Kim TW; Ahn SJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 71(7):1178-86. PubMed ID: 23455416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Palestinians norms of Steiner cephalometric analysis.
    Hussien E; Al-Khateeb S; Mowais MA
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):e5-9. PubMed ID: 21490988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Craniofacial morphologic predictors of oral appliance outcomes in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.
    Shen HL; Wen YW; Chen NH; Liao YF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Nov; 143(11):1209-17. PubMed ID: 23115150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Craniofacial profile in Southern Chinese with hypodontia.
    Chan DW; Samman N; McMillan AS
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19193707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reliability of cephalometric analysis using manual and interactive computer methods.
    Davis DN; Mackay F
    Br J Orthod; 1991 May; 18(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 1911687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part II.
    Holdaway RA
    Am J Orthod; 1984 Apr; 85(4):279-93. PubMed ID: 6585146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Eastman Standard Incisor Angulations: are they still appropriate?
    MacAllister MJ; Rock WP
    Br J Orthod; 1992 Feb; 19(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1562579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Glenoid fossa position in Class II malocclusion associated with mandibular retrusion.
    Giuntini V; De Toffol L; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):808-12. PubMed ID: 18298205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.