These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17402297)

  • 1. Effects of stimulus level on cortical auditory event-related potentials evoked by speech.
    Garinis AC; Cone-Wesson BK
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Feb; 18(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 17402297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
    Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
    Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of various articulatory features of speech on cortical event-related potentials and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):491-504. PubMed ID: 20453651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural indices of phonemic discrimination and sentence-level speech intelligibility in quiet and noise: A P3 study.
    Koerner TK; Zhang Y; Nelson PB; Wang B; Zou H
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():58-67. PubMed ID: 28441570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of stimulus frequency and complexity on the mismatch negativity and other components of the cortical auditory-evoked potential.
    Wunderlich JL; Cone-Wesson BK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Apr; 109(4):1526-37. PubMed ID: 11325124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Oates PA; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2002 Oct; 23(5):399-415. PubMed ID: 12411773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss and personal hearing AIDS on cortical event-related potential and behavioral measures of speech-sound processing.
    Korczak PA; Kurtzberg D; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):165-85. PubMed ID: 15809543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of Consonant Duration on Formation of Consonant-Vowel Syllable Evoked Auditory Cortical Potentials.
    Yaralı M; Yağcıoğlu S
    J Int Adv Otol; 2018 Apr; 14(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 29092801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the relationship between auditory cognition and speech intelligibility in cochlear implant users: An ERP study.
    Finke M; Büchner A; Ruigendijk E; Meyer M; Sandmann P
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jul; 87():169-181. PubMed ID: 27212057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
    Niemczak CE; Vander Werff KR
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
    Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The intensity of masking noise affects the mismatch negativity to speech sounds in human subjects.
    Muller-Gass A; Marcoux A; Logan J; Campbell KB
    Neurosci Lett; 2001 Feb; 299(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 11165769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Speech evoked potentials: from the laboratory to the clinic.
    Martin BA; Tremblay KL; Korczak P
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):285-313. PubMed ID: 18453883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech-evoked cortical potentials and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.
    Groenen PA; Beynon AJ; Snik AF; van den Broek P
    Scand Audiol; 2001; 30(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 11330917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cognitive evoked potentials to speech and tonal stimuli in children with implants.
    Kileny PR; Boerst A; Zwolan T
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Sep; 117(3 Pt 1):161-9. PubMed ID: 9334760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory P300 in Noise in Younger and Older Adults.
    McCullagh J; Shinn JB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018; 29(10):909-916. PubMed ID: 30479263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of cortical auditory evoked potentials to evaluate neural encoding of speech sounds in adults.
    Agung K; Purdy SC; McMahon CM; Newall P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2006 Sep; 17(8):559-72. PubMed ID: 16999251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is discrimination training necessary to cause changes in the P2 auditory event-related brain potential to speech sounds?
    Sheehan KA; McArthur GM; Bishop DV
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 25(2):547-53. PubMed ID: 16198089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.