389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17402338)
1. Justice in Nuremberg: the doctors' trial--60 years later. A reminder.
Adam YG
Isr Med Assoc J; 2007 Mar; 9(3):194-5. PubMed ID: 17402338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Nuremberg doctors' trial in historical context.
Marrus MR
Bull Hist Med; 1999; 73(1):106-23. PubMed ID: 10189729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reassessing the influence of the Nuremberg Code on American medical ethics.
Moreno JD
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1997; 13(2):347-60. PubMed ID: 9212522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Care of the medical ethos, with some comments on research: reflections after the holocaust.
Barondess JA
Perspect Biol Med; 2000; 43(3):308-24. PubMed ID: 10893721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The changing landscape of human experimentation: Nuremberg, Helsinki, and beyond.
Annas GJ
Health Matrix Clevel; 1992; 2(2):119-40. PubMed ID: 10124876
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. 50 years ago: the Nuremberg Doctors' Tribunal. Part 4: Nazi medicine's relevance today.
Ernst E
Wien Med Wochenschr; 1997; 147(3):70-1. PubMed ID: 9086587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Nuremberg Code and the Nuremberg Trial. A reappraisal.
Katz J
JAMA; 1996 Nov; 276(20):1662-6. PubMed ID: 8922453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fifty years later: the significance of the Nuremberg Code.
Shuster E
N Engl J Med; 1997 Nov; 337(20):1436-40. PubMed ID: 9358142
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Too hard to face.
Caplan AL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):394-400. PubMed ID: 16186207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 50 years ago: the Nuremberg doctors' tribunal. Part 2: Medical resistance during the Third Reich.
Ernst E
Wien Med Wochenschr; 1996; 146(24):629-31. PubMed ID: 9123951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Nuremberg Code, German law, and prominent physician-thinkers.
Rothman DJ
JAMA; 1997 Mar; 277(9):709; author reply 709-10. PubMed ID: 9042834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medicine and conscience: the debate on medical ethics and research in Germany 50 years after Nuremberg.
Wunder M
Perspect Biol Med; 2000; 43(3):373-81. PubMed ID: 10893726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Ethical issues of human experimentation with special reference to informed consent].
Saso L; Silvestrini B
Minerva Med; 2000 Oct; 91(10):255-65. PubMed ID: 11236391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Informed consent in human experimentation (Nürenberg Code)].
Ishy R
Harefuah; 1997 Sep; 133(5-6):193-5. PubMed ID: 9461688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Nuremberg Code 70 Years Later.
Moreno JD; Schmidt U; Joffe S
JAMA; 2017 Sep; 318(9):795-796. PubMed ID: 28817743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Nuremberg Code, German law, and prominent physician-thinkers.
Sass HM
JAMA; 1997 Mar; 277(9):709; author reply 709-10. PubMed ID: 9042833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. United States v Karl Brandt. Forgotten? Almost.
Einspruch BC
Tex Med; 1997 Feb; 93(2):14-5. PubMed ID: 9043176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Human guinea pigs and the ethics of experimentation: the BMJ's correspondent at the Nuremberg medical trial.
Weindling P
BMJ; 1996 Dec; 313(7070):1467-70. PubMed ID: 8973237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. American Doctors at the Nuremberg Medical Trial.
Shuster E
Am J Public Health; 2018 Jan; 108(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 29161059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retreat from Nuremberg: can we prevent unethical medical research?
Horner JS
Public Health; 1999 Sep; 113(5):205-10. PubMed ID: 10557112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
