542 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17403808)
1. Revision total hip arthroplasty for pelvic discontinuity.
DeBoer DK; Christie MJ; Brinson MF; Morrison JC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2007 Apr; 89(4):835-40. PubMed ID: 17403808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimum Five-Year Outcomes with Porous Tantalum Acetabular Cup and Augment Construct in Complex Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Jenkins DR; Odland AN; Sierra RJ; Hanssen AD; Lewallen DG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(10):e49. PubMed ID: 28509833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Management of severe periacetabular bone loss combined with pelvic discontinuity in revision hip arthroplasty.
Friedrich MJ; Schmolders J; Michel RD; Randau TM; Wimmer MD; Kohlhof H; Wirtz DC; Gravius S
Int Orthop; 2014 Dec; 38(12):2455-61. PubMed ID: 25027976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component with screw fixation. An average ten-year follow-up study.
Clohisy JC; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Jan; 81(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 9973056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Oblong acetabular cup, type TC, for revision total hip arthroplasty].
Trč T; Stastný E
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2012; 79(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 23286682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Berry DJ; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD; Cabanela ME
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Dec; 81(12):1692-702. PubMed ID: 10608380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pelvic discontinuity treated with custom triflange component: a reliable option.
Taunton MJ; Fehring TK; Edwards P; Bernasek T; Holt GE; Christie MJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2012 Feb; 470(2):428-34. PubMed ID: 21997785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reconstruction of acetabular defects with porous tantalum shells and augments in revision total hip arthroplasty at ten-year follow-up.
Löchel J; Janz V; Hipfl C; Perka C; Wassilew GI
Bone Joint J; 2019 Mar; 101-B(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 30813786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cup-cage reconstruction for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity: Mid-term Results of a Consecutive Series of 35 Cases.
Hipfl C; Janz V; Löchel J; Perka C; Wassilew GI
Bone Joint J; 2018 Nov; 100-B(11):1442-1448. PubMed ID: 30418066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimum ten-year results of primary bipolar hip arthroplasty for degenerative arthritis of the hip.
Pellegrini VD; Heiges BA; Bixler B; Lehman EB; Davis CM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1817-25. PubMed ID: 16882907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acetabular defect reconstruction in revision hip arthroplasty with a modular revision system and biological defect augmentation.
Schmolders J; Friedrich MJ; Michel RD; Randau TM; Wimmer MD; Strauss AC; Kohlhof H; Wirtz DC; Gravius S
Int Orthop; 2015 Apr; 39(4):623-30. PubMed ID: 25277762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Stability of the Porous Tantalum Components Used in Revision THA to Treat Severe Acetabular Defects: A Radiostereometric Analysis Study.
Solomon LB; Abrahams JM; Callary SA; Howie DW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Nov; 100(22):1926-1933. PubMed ID: 30480597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Promising Mid-term Results With a Cup-cage Construct for Large Acetabular Defects and Pelvic Discontinuity.
Amenabar T; Rahman WA; Hetaimish BM; Kuzyk PR; Safir OA; Gross AE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):408-14. PubMed ID: 25712864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Survival and polyethylene wear of porous-coated acetabular components in patients less than fifty years old: results at nine to fourteen years.
Crowther JD; Lachiewicz PF
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 May; 84(5):729-35. PubMed ID: 12004013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Porous-ingrowth revision acetabular implants secured with peripheral screws. A minimum twelve-year follow-up.
Weeden SH; Paprosky WG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Jun; 88(6):1266-71. PubMed ID: 16757760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Short-term results of a custom triflange acetabular component for massive acetabular bone loss in revision THA.
Wind MA; Swank ML; Sorger JI
Orthopedics; 2013 Mar; 36(3):e260-5. PubMed ID: 23464943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Acetabular revision after failed total hip arthroplasty in patients with congenital hip dislocation and dysplasia. Results after a mean of 8.6 years.
Dearborn JT; Harris WH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2000 Aug; 82(8):1146-53. PubMed ID: 10954105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Are custom triflange acetabular components effective for reconstruction of catastrophic bone loss?
Berasi CC; Berend KR; Adams JB; Ruh EL; Lombardi AV
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Feb; 473(2):528-35. PubMed ID: 25315276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Construct Rigidity: Keystone for Treating Pelvic Discontinuity.
Martin JR; Barrett I; Sierra RJ; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(9):e43. PubMed ID: 28463925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Good results at 2-year follow-up of a custom-made triflange acetabular component for large acetabular defects and pelvic discontinuity: a prospective case series of 50 hips.
Scharff-Baauw M; Van Hooff ML; Van Hellemondt GG; Jutte PC; Bulstra SK; Spruit M
Acta Orthop; 2021 Jun; 92(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 33583339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
