252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17404220)
1. Evidence that cochlear-implanted deaf patients are better multisensory integrators.
Rouger J; Lagleyre S; Fraysse B; Deneve S; Deguine O; Barone P
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Apr; 104(17):7295-300. PubMed ID: 17404220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Degradation of labial information modifies audiovisual speech perception in cochlear-implanted children.
Huyse A; Berthommier F; Leybaert J
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):110-21. PubMed ID: 23059850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual activity predicts auditory recovery from deafness after adult cochlear implantation.
Strelnikov K; Rouger J; Demonet JF; Lagleyre S; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Barone P
Brain; 2013 Dec; 136(Pt 12):3682-95. PubMed ID: 24136826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evolution of crossmodal reorganization of the voice area in cochlear-implanted deaf patients.
Rouger J; Lagleyre S; Démonet JF; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Barone P
Hum Brain Mapp; 2012 Aug; 33(8):1929-40. PubMed ID: 21557388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of congruent and incongruent visual cues on speech perception and brain activity in cochlear implant users.
Song JJ; Lee HJ; Kang H; Lee DS; Chang SO; Oh SH
Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Mar; 220(2):1109-25. PubMed ID: 24402676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cortical reorganization in postlingually deaf cochlear implant users: Intra-modal and cross-modal considerations.
Stropahl M; Chen LC; Debener S
Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 343():128-137. PubMed ID: 27473503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Role of speechreading in audiovisual interactions during the recovery of speech comprehension in deaf adults with cochlear implants.
Strelnikov K; Rouger J; Barone P; Deguine O
Scand J Psychol; 2009 Oct; 50(5):437-44. PubMed ID: 19778391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The timecourse of multisensory speech processing in unilaterally stimulated cochlear implant users revealed by ERPs.
Layer N; Weglage A; Müller V; Meister H; Lang-Roth R; Walger M; Murray MM; Sandmann P
Neuroimage Clin; 2022; 34():102982. PubMed ID: 35303598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. McGurk effects in cochlear-implanted deaf subjects.
Rouger J; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Barone P
Brain Res; 2008 Jan; 1188():87-99. PubMed ID: 18062941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Plasticity in bilateral superior temporal cortex: Effects of deafness and cochlear implantation on auditory and visual speech processing.
Anderson CA; Lazard DS; Hartley DE
Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 343():138-149. PubMed ID: 27473501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing the effect of auditory-only and auditory-visual modes in two groups of Persian children using cochlear implants: a randomized clinical trial.
Oryadi Zanjani MM; Hasanzadeh S; Rahgozar M; Shemshadi H; Purdy SC; Mahmudi Bakhtiari B; Vahab M
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Sep; 77(9):1545-50. PubMed ID: 23896386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multisensory Integration in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Stevenson RA; Sheffield SW; Butera IM; Gifford RH; Wallace MT
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):521-538. PubMed ID: 28399064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validating a Method to Assess Lipreading, Audiovisual Gain, and Integration During Speech Reception With Cochlear-Implanted and Normal-Hearing Subjects Using a Talking Head.
Schreitmüller S; Frenken M; Bentz L; Ortmann M; Walger M; Meister H
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):503-516. PubMed ID: 29068860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improvement in speech-reading ability by auditory training: Evidence from gender differences in normally hearing, deaf and cochlear implanted subjects.
Strelnikov K; Rouger J; Lagleyre S; Fraysse B; Deguine O; Barone P
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Mar; 47(4):972-9. PubMed ID: 19022268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Crossmodal interactions during non-linguistic auditory processing in cochlear-implanted deaf patients.
Barone P; Chambaudie L; Strelnikov K; Fraysse B; Marx M; Belin P; Deguine O
Cortex; 2016 Oct; 83():259-70. PubMed ID: 27622640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speechreading in Deaf Adults with Cochlear Implants: Evidence for Perceptual Compensation.
Pimperton H; Ralph-Lewis A; MacSweeney M
Front Psychol; 2017; 8():106. PubMed ID: 28223951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multisensory Integration-Attention Trade-Off in Cochlear-Implanted Deaf Individuals.
van de Rijt LPH; van Opstal AJ; van Wanrooij MM
Front Neurosci; 2021; 15():683804. PubMed ID: 34393707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Audio-visual speech perception in prelingually deafened Japanese children following sequential bilateral cochlear implantation.
Yamamoto R; Naito Y; Tona R; Moroto S; Tamaya R; Fujiwara K; Shinohara S; Takebayashi S; Kikuchi M; Michida T
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Nov; 102():160-168. PubMed ID: 29106867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Voice gender discrimination provides a measure of more than pitch-related perception in cochlear implant users.
Li T; Fu QJ
Int J Audiol; 2011 Aug; 50(8):498-502. PubMed ID: 21696330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
