484 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17404442)
21. Comparative effectiveness of perineal versus retropubic and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
Prasad SM; Gu X; Lavelle R; Lipsitz SR; Hu JC
J Urol; 2011 Jan; 185(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 21074198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Seminal vesicle-sparing perineal radical prostatectomy improves early functional results in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.
Albers P; Schäfers S; Löhmer H; de Geeter P
BJU Int; 2007 Nov; 100(5):1050-4. PubMed ID: 17760889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Localized prostatic cancer: treatment with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: study with 841 cases].
Vallancien G; Guillonneau B; Cathelineau X; Baumert H; Doublet JD
Bull Acad Natl Med; 2002; 186(1):117-23; discussion 123-4. PubMed ID: 12146136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Functional outcomes and oncological efficacy of Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy with Veil of Aphrodite nerve-sparing: an analysis of 154 consecutive patients.
Kaul S; Savera A; Badani K; Fumo M; Bhandari A; Menon M
BJU Int; 2006 Mar; 97(3):467-72. PubMed ID: 16469009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Prostate cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial:VA/NCI/AHRQ Cooperative Studies Program #407 (PIVOT): design and baseline results of a randomized controlled trial comparing radical prostatectomy to watchful waiting for men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
Wilt TJ; Brawer MK; Barry MJ; Jones KM; Kwon Y; Gingrich JR; Aronson WJ; Nsouli I; Iyer P; Cartagena R; Snider G; Roehrborn C; Fox S
Contemp Clin Trials; 2009 Jan; 30(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 18783735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Perineal complications following radical perineal prostatectomy.
Fichtner J; Gillitzer R; Melchior SW; Hohenfellner M; Thüroff JW
Aktuelle Urol; 2003 Jul; 34(4):223-5. PubMed ID: 14566668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Achieving optimal outcomes after radical prostatectomy.
Saranchuk JW; Kattan MW; Elkin E; Touijer AK; Scardino PT; Eastham JA
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Jun; 23(18):4146-51. PubMed ID: 15961762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of nerve sparing technique on patient self-assessed outcomes after radical perineal prostatectomy.
Kübler HR; Tseng TY; Sun L; Vieweg J; Harris MJ; Dahm P
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):488-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17561133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Radical retropubic prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer in renal transplant patients.
Antonopoulos IM; Nahas WC; Piovesan AC; Falci R; Kanashiro H; Alvarez GA; Srougi M
Urology; 2008 Dec; 72(6):1362-5. PubMed ID: 18485460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: preliminary result of Thailand series.
Nualyong C; Srinualnad S; Taweemonkongsap T; Amornvesukit T
J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Sep; 89(9):1440-6. PubMed ID: 17100382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Salvage radical prostatectomy following primary high intensity focused ultrasound for treatment of prostate cancer.
Lawrentschuk N; Finelli A; Van der Kwast TH; Ryan P; Bolton DM; Fleshner NE; Trachtenberg J; Klotz L; Robinette M; Woo H
J Urol; 2011 Mar; 185(3):862-8. PubMed ID: 21239003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Conformal radiotherapy for detectable PSA following radical prostatectomy: efficacy and predictive factors of recurrence.
Delongchamps NB; Zerbib M; Mejean A; Rouach Y; Debre B; Peyromaure M
Can J Urol; 2009 Oct; 16(5):4813-9. PubMed ID: 19796456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prostate cancer disease-free survival after radical retropubic prostatectomy in patients older than 70 years compared to younger cohorts.
Malaeb BS; Rashid HH; Lotan Y; Khoddami SM; Shariat SF; Sagalowsky AI; McConnell JD; Roehrborn CG; Koeneman KS
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 17628294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach.
Joseph JV; Rosenbaum R; Madeb R; Erturk E; Patel HR
J Urol; 2006 Mar; 175(3 Pt 1):945-50; discussion 951. PubMed ID: 16469589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Antegrade radical retropubic prostatectomy with preliminary ligation of vascular pedicles in 614 consecutive patients.
Kawakami S; Fukui I; Yonese J; Okubo Y; Yamamoto S; Tsukamoto T; Ishikawa Y
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2007 Jul; 37(7):528-33. PubMed ID: 17720739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impact of a novel, extended approach of perineal radical prostatectomy on surgical margins in localized prostate cancer.
Inoue S; Shiina H; Sumura M; Urakami S; Matsubara A; Igawa M
BJU Int; 2010 Jul; 106(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 20067449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Surgical outcomes for men undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after transurethral resection of the prostate.
Jaffe J; Stakhovsky O; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G; Rozet F
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):483-7; discussion 487. PubMed ID: 17561162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Minimal invasiveness of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: reality or dream?].
Fornara P; Zacharias M
Aktuelle Urol; 2004 Sep; 35(5):395-405. PubMed ID: 15368129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: oncological results in the first 500 patients.
Rassweiler J; Schulze M; Teber D; Marrero R; Seemann O; Rumpelt J; Frede T
J Urol; 2005 Mar; 173(3):761-4. PubMed ID: 15711264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
