491 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17404460)
1. A feasibility study of using conventional jaws to deliver IMRT plans in the treatment of prostate cancer.
Kim Y; Verhey LJ; Xia P
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2147-56. PubMed ID: 17404460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A feasibility study of using conventional jaws to deliver complex IMRT plans for head and neck cancer.
Mu G; Xia P
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5613-23. PubMed ID: 19724096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of benchmark dose-volume histograms for selection of the optimal technique between three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy in prostate cancer.
Luo C; Yang CC; Narayan S; Stern RL; Perks J; Goldberg Z; Ryu J; Purdy JA; Vijayakumar S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Nov; 66(4):1253-62. PubMed ID: 17145540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions.
Dvorak P; Georg D; Bogner J; Kroupa B; Dieckmann K; Pötter R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Apr; 61(5):1572-81. PubMed ID: 15817364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of conformal and intensity modulated treatment planning techniques for early prostate cancer.
Vaarkamp J; Malde R; Dixit S; Hamilton CS
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Jun; 53(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 19624299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Persistently better treatment planning results of intensity-modulated (IMRT) over conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in prostate cancer patients with significant variation of clinical target volume and/or organs-at-risk.
Fenoglietto P; Laliberte B; Allaw A; Ailleres N; Idri K; Hay MH; Moscardo CL; Gourgou S; Dubois JB; Azria D
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 18215434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of IMRT planning with two-step and one-step optimization: a way to simplify IMRT.
Ludlum E; Xia P
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(3):807-21. PubMed ID: 18199916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) vs. serial tomotherapy, step-and-shoot IMRT and 3D-conformal RT for treatment of prostate cancer.
Wolff D; Stieler F; Welzel G; Lorenz F; Abo-Madyan Y; Mai S; Herskind C; Polednik M; Steil V; Wenz F; Lohr F
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Nov; 93(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 19765846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy for esophageal cancer.
Vivekanandan N; Sriram P; Kumar SA; Bhuvaneswari N; Saranya K
Med Dosim; 2012; 37(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 21940159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of direct aperture optimization when applied to head-and-neck IMRT.
Jones S; Williams M
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 18262129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric advantages of IMRT simultaneous integrated boost for high-risk prostate cancer.
Li XA; Wang JZ; Jursinic PA; Lawton CA; Wang D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(4):1251-7. PubMed ID: 15752907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pelvic nodal dose escalation with prostate hypofractionation using conformal avoidance defined (H-CAD) intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Hong TS; Tomé WA; Jaradat H; Raisbeck BM; Ritter MA
Acta Oncol; 2006; 45(6):717-27. PubMed ID: 16938815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An examination of the number of required apertures for step-and-shoot IMRT.
Jiang Z; Earl MA; Zhang GW; Yu CX; Shepard DM
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5653-63. PubMed ID: 16306659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric and radiobiologic comparison of 3D conformal versus intensity modulated planning techniques for prostate bed radiotherapy.
Koontz BF; Das S; Temple K; Bynum S; Catalano S; Koontz JI; Montana GS; Oleson JR
Med Dosim; 2009; 34(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 19647638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of forward and inverse planned conformal, multi segment and intensity modulated radiotherapy for the treatment of prostate and pelvic nodes.
Vaarkamp J; Adams EJ; Warrington AP; Dearnaley DP
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Oct; 73(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 15465148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dose to bone marrow using IMRT techniques in prostate cancer patients.
Gershkevitsh E; Clark CH; Staffurth J; Dearnaley DP; Trott KR
Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Mar; 181(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 15756521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of methods for beam angle optimization for IMRT using an accelerated exhaustive search strategy.
Wang X; Zhang X; Dong L; Liu H; Wu Q; Mohan R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1325-37. PubMed ID: 15519806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of spatial dose gradients and probability density function to evaluate the effect of internal organ motion for prostate IMRT treatment planning.
Jiang R; Barnett RB; Chow JC; Chen JZ
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1469-84. PubMed ID: 17301465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiotherapy of prostate cancer with multileaf collimators (MLCs) optimization of the undulating dose distribution at the MLC edge.
Koelbl O; Schwab F; Bratengeier K; Vordermark D; Flentje M
Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 Feb; 181(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 15702299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
