120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17404468)
21. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for pancreatic and prostate cancer using pulsed low-dose rate delivery techniques.
Li J; Lang J; Wang P; Kang S; Lin MH; Chen X; Chen F; Guo M; Chen L; Ma CM
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(4):330-6. PubMed ID: 25087084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Organ and effective doses in newborn patients during helical multislice computed tomography examination.
Staton RJ; Lee C; Lee C; Williams MD; Hintenlang DE; Arreola MM; Williams JL; Bolch WE
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5151-66. PubMed ID: 17019030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Measurement and comparison of skin dose for prostate and head-and-neck patients treated on various IMRT delivery systems.
Roland TF; Stathakis S; Ramer R; Papanikolaou N
Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Dec; 66(12):1844-9. PubMed ID: 18571930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Dose calculation accuracy using cone-beam CT (CBCT) for pelvic adaptive radiotherapy.
Guan H; Dong H
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6239-50. PubMed ID: 19794241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of radiation doses between cone beam CT and multi detector CT: TLD measurements.
Kim S; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Yoo S; Yin FF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 19074786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography.
Chau AC; Fung K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Apr; 107(4):559-65. PubMed ID: 19168378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A dose comparison study between XVI and OBI CBCT systems.
Song WY; Kamath S; Ozawa S; Ani SA; Chvetsov A; Bhandare N; Palta JR; Liu C; Li JG
Med Phys; 2008 Feb; 35(2):480-6. PubMed ID: 18383668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessment of residual error for online cone-beam CT-guided treatment of prostate cancer patients.
Létourneau D; Martinez AA; Lockman D; Yan D; Vargas C; Ivaldi G; Wong J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jul; 62(4):1239-46. PubMed ID: 15913917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Technical note: A new TLD-phantom measurement system for determining dose distribution levels in the right and left breast from spiral CT chest imaging.
Hall JL; Navarrete JL; Surprenant E; Sklansky J; Eisenman JI
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2002; 3(4):324-7. PubMed ID: 12383053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dosimetry of a cone-beam computed tomography machine compared with a digital x-ray machine in orthodontic imaging.
Grünheid T; Kolbeck Schieck JR; Pliska BT; Ahmad M; Larson BE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Apr; 141(4):436-43. PubMed ID: 22464525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Online image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: How much improvement can we expect? A theoretical assessment of clinical benefits and potential dose escalation by improving precision and accuracy of radiation delivery.
Ghilezan M; Yan D; Liang J; Jaffray D; Wong J; Martinez A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1602-10. PubMed ID: 15590192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Validation of metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for organ dose assessment during CT: comparison with thermoluminescent dosimetry.
Yoshizumi TT; Goodman PC; Frush DP; Nguyen G; Toncheva G; Sarder M; Barnes L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 May; 188(5):1332-6. PubMed ID: 17449779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Use of deformed intensity distributions for on-line modification of image-guided IMRT to account for interfractional anatomic changes.
Mohan R; Zhang X; Wang H; Kang Y; Wang X; Liu H; Ang KK; Kuban D; Dong L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(4):1258-66. PubMed ID: 15752908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Linac-based on-board imaging feasibility and the dosimetric consequences of head roll in head-and-neck IMRT plans.
Kim GY; Pawlicki T; Le QT; Luxton G
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 18262130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. PET-based radiation dosimetry in man of 18F-fluorodihydrotestosterone, a new radiotracer for imaging prostate cancer.
Zanzonico PB; Finn R; Pentlow KS; Erdi Y; Beattie B; Akhurst T; Squire O; Morris M; Scher H; McCarthy T; Welch M; Larson SM; Humm JL
J Nucl Med; 2004 Nov; 45(11):1966-71. PubMed ID: 15534070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Dosimetric effects of patient rotational setup errors on prostate IMRT treatments.
Fu W; Yang Y; Li X; Heron DE; Huq MS; Yue NJ
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(20):5321-31. PubMed ID: 17019041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Out-of-field photon and neutron dose equivalents from step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Kry SF; Salehpour M; Followill DS; Stovall M; Kuban DA; White RA; Rosen II
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jul; 62(4):1204-16. PubMed ID: 15990026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. An alternative approach to account for patient organ doses from imaging guidance procedures.
Nelson AP; Ding GX
Radiother Oncol; 2014 Jul; 112(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 25023041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A treatment planning investigation into the dosimetric effects of systematic prostate patient rotational set-up errors.
Cranmer-Sargison G
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 18674684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. MRI-based treatment planning for radiotherapy: dosimetric verification for prostate IMRT.
Chen L; Price RA; Wang L; Li J; Qin L; McNeeley S; Ma CM; Freedman GM; Pollack A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Oct; 60(2):636-47. PubMed ID: 15380601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
