These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17404471)

  • 1. The application of maximum likelihood factor analysis (MLFA) with uniqueness constraints on dynamic cardiac microPET data.
    Su Y; Welch MJ; Shoghi KI
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2313-34. PubMed ID: 17404471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Image segmentation and activity estimation for microPET 11C-raclopride images using an expectation-maximum algorithm with a mixture of Poisson distributions.
    Su KH; Chen JS; Lee JS; Hu CM; Chang CW; Chou YH; Liu RS; Chen JC
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2011 Jul; 35(5):417-26. PubMed ID: 21288690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maximum a posteriori reconstruction of the Patlak parametric image from sinograms in dynamic PET.
    Wang G; Fu L; Qi J
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(3):593-604. PubMed ID: 18199904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Direct reconstruction of kinetic parameter images from dynamic PET data.
    Kamasak ME; Bouman CA; Morris ED; Sauer K
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):636-50. PubMed ID: 15889551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mean and covariance properties of dynamic PET reconstructions from list-mode data.
    Asma E; Leahy RM
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Jan; 25(1):42-54. PubMed ID: 16398413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Block-iterative Fisher scoring algorithms for maximum penalized likelihood image reconstruction in emission tomography.
    Ma J; Hudson M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Aug; 27(8):1130-42. PubMed ID: 18672430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improvement of likelihood estimation in Logan graphical analysis using maximum a posteriori for neuroreceptor PET imaging.
    Shidahara M; Seki C; Naganawa M; Sakata M; Ishikawa M; Ito H; Kanno I; Ishiwata K; Kimura Y
    Ann Nucl Med; 2009 Feb; 23(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 19225940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative dynamic cardiac 82Rb PET using generalized factor and compartment analyses.
    El Fakhri G; Sitek A; Guérin B; Kijewski MF; Di Carli MF; Moore SC
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Aug; 46(8):1264-71. PubMed ID: 16085581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical dynamic image reconstruction in state-of-the-art high-resolution PET.
    Rahmim A; Cheng JC; Blinder S; Camborde ML; Sossi V
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(20):4887-912. PubMed ID: 16204879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maximum-entropy expectation-maximization algorithm for image reconstruction and sensor field estimation.
    Hong H; Schonfeld D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2008 Jun; 17(6):897-907. PubMed ID: 18482885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Revisiting stopping rules for iterative methods used in emission tomography.
    Guo H; Renaut RA
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2011 Jul; 35(5):398-406. PubMed ID: 21195584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Regularized image reconstruction algorithms for positron emission tomography.
    Chang JH; Anderson JM; Votaw JR
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Sep; 23(9):1165-75. PubMed ID: 15377125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between MAP and postprocessed ML for image reconstruction in emission tomography when anatomical knowledge is available.
    Nuyts J; Baete K; Bequé D; Dupont P
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 May; 24(5):667-75. PubMed ID: 15889553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. PET kinetic analysis: error consideration of quantitative analysis in dynamic studies.
    Ikoma Y; Watabe H; Shidahara M; Naganawa M; Kimura Y
    Ann Nucl Med; 2008 Jan; 22(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 18250982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improvement of algorithm for quantification of regional myocardial blood flow using 15O-water with PET.
    Katoh C; Morita K; Shiga T; Kubo N; Nakada K; Tamaki N
    J Nucl Med; 2004 Nov; 45(11):1908-16. PubMed ID: 15534062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimization of the injected activity in dynamic 3D PET: a generalized approach using patient-specific NECs as demonstrated by a series of 15O-H2O scans.
    Walker MD; Matthews JC; Asselin MC; Saleem A; Dickinson C; Charnley N; Julyan PJ; Price PM; Jones T
    J Nucl Med; 2009 Sep; 50(9):1409-17. PubMed ID: 19690021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of transmission methodology and attenuation correction for the microPET Focus 220 animal scanner.
    Lehnert W; Meikle SR; Siegel S; Newport D; Banati RB; Rosenfeld AB
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 51(16):4003-16. PubMed ID: 16885620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attenuation correction for small animal PET tomographs.
    Chow PL; Rannou FR; Chatziioannou AF
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 50(8):1837-50. PubMed ID: 15815099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A weighted dictionary learning model for denoising images corrupted by mixed noise.
    Liu J; Tai XC; Huang H; Huan Z
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Mar; 22(3):1108-20. PubMed ID: 23193456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simulation-based evaluation of OSEM iterative reconstruction methods in dynamic brain PET studies.
    Reilhac A; Tomeï S; Buvat I; Michel C; Keheren F; Costes N
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):359-68. PubMed ID: 17920931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.