These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17406105)

  • 1. Testing a method for quantifying the output of implantable middle ear hearing devices.
    Rosowski JJ; Chien W; Ravicz ME; Merchant SN
    Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(4):265-76. PubMed ID: 17406105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of static force on round window stimulation with the direct acoustic cochlea stimulator.
    Maier H; Salcher R; Schwab B; Lenarz T
    Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():115-24. PubMed ID: 23276731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stapes displacement and intracochlear pressure in response to very high level, low frequency sounds.
    Greene NT; Jenkins HA; Tollin DJ; Easter JR
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():16-30. PubMed ID: 28189837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implementation of a direct install 3-pole type EM transducer in round window niche for implantable middle ear hearing aids.
    Shin DH; Lim HG; Jung ES; Wei Q; Seong KW; Lee JH; Lee SH; Cho JH
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):2503-10. PubMed ID: 25226951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Middle ear cavity and ear canal pressure-driven stapes velocity responses in human cadaveric temporal bones.
    O'Connor KN; Puria S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Sep; 120(3):1517-28. PubMed ID: 17004473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of auditory responses determined by acoustic stimulation and by mechanical round window stimulation at equivalent stapes velocities.
    Lee J; Seong K; Lee SH; Lee KY; Cho JH
    Hear Res; 2014 Aug; 314():65-71. PubMed ID: 24768763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrocochleographic and mechanical assessment of round window stimulation with an active middle ear prosthesis.
    Koka K; Holland NJ; Lupo JE; Jenkins HA; Tollin DJ
    Hear Res; 2010 May; 263(1-2):128-37. PubMed ID: 19720125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A 3D-printed functioning anatomical human middle ear model.
    Kuru I; Maier H; Müller M; Lenarz T; Lueth TC
    Hear Res; 2016 Oct; 340():204-213. PubMed ID: 26772730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laser Doppler vibrometric assessment of middle ear motion in Thiel-embalmed heads.
    Stieger C; Candreia C; Kompis M; Herrmann G; Pfiffner F; Widmer D; Arnold A
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 22377645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic stimulation on the round window for active middle ear implants.
    Seong K; Lee K; Puria S; Cho JH
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 Jun; 97():171-177. PubMed ID: 29747060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of differental intracochlear pressures between round window stimulation and ear canal stimulation].
    Wang X
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2012 Dec; 29(6):1109-13. PubMed ID: 23469540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of Silastic sheeting over the round window niche on sound transmission in the intact human middle ear.
    Alian WA; Majdalawieh OF; Van Wijhe RG; Ejnell H; Bance M
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 22498261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Objective assessment of stapedotomy surgery from round window motion measurement.
    Sim JH; Chatzimichalis M; Röösli C; Laske RD; Huber AM
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):e24-31. PubMed ID: 22699658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of forward (ear-canal) and reverse (round-window) sound stimulation of the cochlea.
    Stieger C; Rosowski JJ; Nakajima HH
    Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():105-14. PubMed ID: 23159918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bone conduction in Thiel-embalmed cadaver heads.
    Guignard J; Stieger C; Kompis M; Caversaccio M; Arnold A
    Hear Res; 2013 Dec; 306():115-22. PubMed ID: 24161399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reinforced active middle ear implant fixation in incus vibroplasty.
    Mlynski R; Dalhoff E; Heyd A; Wildenstein D; Hagen R; Gummer AW; Schraven SP
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 25099400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of methods for prediction of clinical output levels of active middle ear implants from measurements in human cadaveric ears.
    Grossöhmichen M; Waldmann B; Salcher R; Prenzler N; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):15877. PubMed ID: 29158536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Feasibility of Round Window Stimulation by a Novel Electromagnetic Microactuator.
    van Drunen WJ; Mueller M; Glukhovskoy A; Salcher R; Wurz MC; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():6369247. PubMed ID: 29214174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of ear-canal pressurization on middle-ear bone- and air-conduction responses.
    Homma K; Shimizu Y; Kim N; Du Y; Puria S
    Hear Res; 2010 May; 263(1-2):204-15. PubMed ID: 19944139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Infrasound transmission in the human ear: Implications for acoustic and vestibular responses of the normal and dehiscent inner ear.
    Raufer S; Masud SF; Nakajima HH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jul; 144(1):332. PubMed ID: 30075646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.