These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17406161)
1. Should decisions about your hiring, reappointment, tenure, or promotion use the impact factor score as a proxy indicator of the impact of your scholarship? Holden G; Rosenberg G; Barker K; Onghena P MedGenMed; 2006 Jul; 8(3):21. PubMed ID: 17406161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Bibliometrics: a potential decision making aid in hiring, reappointment, tenure and promotion decisions. Holden G; Rosenberg G; Barker K Soc Work Health Care; 2005; 41(3-4):67-92. PubMed ID: 16236639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Politics of personnel and landscapes of knowledge. Kirk SA Soc Work Health Care; 2005; 41(3-4):109-16. PubMed ID: 16236642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bibliometrics and social work: a two-edged sword can still be a blunt instrument. Ligon J; Thyer BA Soc Work Health Care; 2005; 41(3-4):123-8. PubMed ID: 16236644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bibliometrics: The best available information? Klein WC; Bloom M Soc Work Health Care; 2005; 41(3-4):117-21. PubMed ID: 16236643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The paradox of faculty publications in professional journals. Green RG Soc Work Health Care; 2005; 41(3-4):103-8. PubMed ID: 16236641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Managing your academic career. The rocky road to tenure. Rose MA Nurse Educ; 1986; 11(5):10-1. PubMed ID: 3640243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Rethinking the promotion and tenure process. Hiller MD; Ritvo RA J Allied Health; 1991; 20(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 1880058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Following in the footnotes of giants: citation analysis and its discontents. Epstein I Soc Work Health Care; 2005; 41(3-4):93-101. PubMed ID: 16236640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Shallow science or meta-cognitive insights: a few thoughts on reflection via bibliometrics. Holden G; Rosenberg G; Barker K Soc Work Health Care; 2005; 41(3-4):129-48. PubMed ID: 16236645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rethinking the promotion and tenure process: a response to Hiller and Ritvo. Ottenbacher KJ; Stull GA J Allied Health; 1992; 21(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 1601732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Selection, promotion and development of employees. Sanniti KJ; McAliley LG; Urbancic CJ; Ivons DA; Frankowski SJ; Soltysiak VF Nurs Manage; 1990 Jan; 21(1):30-1, 34. PubMed ID: 2294491 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Developing criteria for promotion and tenure. Garrity M; Miller V; Osborn M; Vanderlinden M Nurs Outlook; 1980 Mar; 28(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 6899063 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Using bibliometrics to advance your academic career. Stidham RW; Sauder K; Higgins PDR Gastroenterology; 2012 Sep; 143(3):520-523. PubMed ID: 22828355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Does the consistent application of criteria for faculty promotion lead to fair decisions? Kanter SL Acad Med; 2008 Oct; 83(10):891-2. PubMed ID: 18820514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Promotion, merit and tenure decisions for college health education faculty. Newell S; Price JH Health Educ; 1983; 14(3):12-5. PubMed ID: 6443912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. U.S. higher education. Report finds no gender bias in faculty hiring, resources. Mervis J Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5932):1250-1. PubMed ID: 19498138 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]