245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17406611)
1. A simple, robust and semi-automated parasite egg isolation protocol.
Mes TH; Eysker M; Ploeger HW
Nat Protoc; 2007; 2(3):486-9. PubMed ID: 17406611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of methods to detect gastrointestinal parasites in llamas and alpacas.
Cebra CK; Stang BV
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2008 Mar; 232(5):733-41. PubMed ID: 18312182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of flotation solution, sample dilution and the choice of McMaster slide area (volume) on the reliability of the McMaster technique in estimating the faecal egg counts of gastrointestinal strongyles and Dicrocoelium dendriticum in sheep.
Cringoli G; Rinaldi L; Veneziano V; Capelli G; Scala A
Vet Parasitol; 2004 Aug; 123(1-2):121-31. PubMed ID: 15265576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Calibration and diagnostic accuracy of simple flotation, McMaster and FLOTAC for parasite egg counts in sheep.
Rinaldi L; Coles GC; Maurelli MP; Musella V; Cringoli G
Vet Parasitol; 2011 May; 177(3-4):345-52. PubMed ID: 21216533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of common fecal flotation techniques for the recovery of parasite eggs and oocysts.
Dryden MW; Payne PA; Ridley R; Smith V
Vet Ther; 2005; 6(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 15906267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Cornell-Wisconsin centrifugal flotation technique for recovering trichostrongylid eggs from bovine feces.
Egwang TG; Slocombe JO
Can J Comp Med; 1982 Apr; 46(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 7093809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of modifications of the McMaster method for the enumeration of Ascaris suum eggs in pig faecal samples.
Pereckiene A; Kaziūnaite V; Vysniauskas A; Petkevicius S; Malakauskas A; Sarkūnas M; Taylor MA
Vet Parasitol; 2007 Oct; 149(1-2):111-6. PubMed ID: 17703889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Further discussion on centrifugation and simple fecal flotation.
Dryden MW; Payne PA; Ridley RK
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2007 Oct; 231(7):1029-30; author reply 1030. PubMed ID: 18027395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of two fecal egg recovery techniques and larval culture for cyathostomins in horses.
Bello TR; Allen TM
Am J Vet Res; 2009 May; 70(5):571-3. PubMed ID: 19405894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The comparison of FLOTAC, FECPAK and McMaster techniques for nematode egg counts in cattle.
Bosco A; Rinaldi L; Maurelli MP; Musella V; Coles GC; Cringoli G
Acta Parasitol; 2014 Oct; 59(4):625-8. PubMed ID: 25236271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of drying time on nematode eggs in scats of scincid lizard Egernia stokesii.
Hallas G; Bull CM
J Parasitol; 2006 Feb; 92(1):192-4. PubMed ID: 16629337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Coprological diagnosis: what's new?].
Cringoli G
Parassitologia; 2004 Jun; 46(1-2):137-9. PubMed ID: 15305703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. American Association of Veterinary Parasitologists' review of veterinary fecal flotation methods and factors influencing their accuracy and use--is there really one best technique?
Ballweber LR; Beugnet F; Marchiondo AA; Payne PA
Vet Parasitol; 2014 Jul; 204(1-2):73-80. PubMed ID: 24893692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Overberg Research Project. IX. First stage larvae per gram [L1p.g.] of faeces; an efficient method of diagnosing nematode parasites of sheep ante mortem.
Reinecke RK
Onderstepoort J Vet Res; 1990 Dec; 57(4):277-80. PubMed ID: 2293137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel method for the isolation of gastro-intestinal nematode eggs that allows automated analysis of digital images of egg preparations and high throughput screening.
Mes TH; Ploeger HW; Terlou M; Kooyman FN; Van der Ploeg MP; Eysker M
Parasitology; 2001 Sep; 123(Pt 3):309-14. PubMed ID: 11578095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of a technique of sedimentation in tubes].
Moitinho Mda L; Ferreira CS
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo; 1994; 36(2):153-6. PubMed ID: 7997791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Avoiding bias in parasite excretion estimates: the effect of sampling time and type of faeces.
Villanúa D; Pérez-Rodríguez L; Gortázar C; Höfle U; Viñuela J
Parasitology; 2006 Aug; 133(Pt 2):251-9. PubMed ID: 16707034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Centrifugation versus simple flotation.
Greenwald RJ
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2007 Aug; 231(3):375-6. PubMed ID: 17703521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [A simple flotation and McMaster method (author's transl)].
Henriksen SA; Aagaard K
Nord Vet Med; 1976; 28(7-8):392-7. PubMed ID: 958869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Discrimination of gastrointestinal nematode eggs from crude fecal egg preparations by inhibitor-resistant conventional and real-time PCR.
Demeler J; Ramünke S; Wolken S; Ianiello D; Rinaldi L; Gahutu JB; Cringoli G; von Samson-Himmelstjerna G; Krücken J
PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e61285. PubMed ID: 23620739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
