These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17407896)

  • 1. Bias due to noise in otoacoustic emission measurements.
    Backus BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Mar; 121(3):1588-603. PubMed ID: 17407896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inter-Subject Variability in the Dependence of Medial-Olivocochlear Reflex Strength on Noise Bandwidth.
    Lee D; Lewis JD
    Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):544-557. PubMed ID: 36477401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Otoacoustic-emission-based medial-olivocochlear reflex assays for humans.
    Marshall L; Lapsley Miller JA; Guinan JJ; Shera CA; Reed CM; Perez ZD; Delhorne LA; Boege P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Nov; 136(5):2697-713. PubMed ID: 25373970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Is Unlikely to Play a Role in Listening Difficulties in Children.
    Boothalingam S; Allan C; Allen P; Purcell DW
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519870942. PubMed ID: 31558110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measurement of medial olivocochlear efferent activity in humans: comparison of different distortion product otoacoustic emission-based paradigms.
    Wagner W; Heyd A
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Oct; 32(8):1379-88. PubMed ID: 21921859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medial Olivocochlear Reflex Strength in Ears With Low-to-Moderate Annual Noise Exposure.
    Lewis JD; Goettl-Meyer M; Lee D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Apr; 66(4):1428-1443. PubMed ID: 36940474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tone burst evoked otoacoustic emissions in different age-groups of schoolchildren.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Pilka E; Skarzynski PH; Olszewski L; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Aug; 79(8):1310-5. PubMed ID: 26092548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Near equivalence of human click-evoked and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions.
    Kalluri R; Shera CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Apr; 121(4):2097-110. PubMed ID: 17471725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative assessment of methods for the detection of otoacoustic emissions.
    Brass D; Kemp DT
    Ear Hear; 1994 Oct; 15(5):378-89. PubMed ID: 7813824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Olivocochlear reflex effect on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions is largest at frequencies with distinct fine structure dips.
    Wagner W; Heppelmann G; Müller J; Janssen T; Zenner HP
    Hear Res; 2007 Jan; 223(1-2):83-92. PubMed ID: 17137736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Within- and Across-Subject Variability of Repeated Measurements of Medial Olivocochlear-Induced Changes in Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.
    Mertes IB; Goodman SS
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):e72-84. PubMed ID: 26583481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs.
    Shera CA; Guinan JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Feb; 105(2 Pt 1):782-98. PubMed ID: 9972564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chirp-evoked otoacoustic emissions in children.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Sliwa L; Pilka E; Piotrowska A; Skarzynski H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jan; 77(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 23116905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using the short-time correlation coefficient to compare transient- and derived, noise-evoked otoacoustic emission temporal waveforms.
    Harte JM; Elliott SJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 May; 117(5):2989-98. PubMed ID: 15957769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Compensating for ear-canal acoustics when measuring otoacoustic emissions.
    Charaziak KK; Shera CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):515. PubMed ID: 28147590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochlear delays measured with amplitude-modulated tone-burst-evoked OAEs.
    Goodman SS; Withnell RH; De Boer E; Lilly DJ; Nuttall AL
    Hear Res; 2004 Feb; 188(1-2):57-69. PubMed ID: 14759571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of 100Hz amplitude modulation on the human medial olivocochlear reflex.
    Boothalingam S; Purcell D; Scollie S
    Neurosci Lett; 2014 Sep; 580():56-61. PubMed ID: 25102324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medial olivocochlear reflex reliability: The effects of averaging and presence of synchronized spontaneous otoacoustic emissions.
    Jedrzejczak WW; Kochanek K; Pilka E; Pastucha M; Skarzynski H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Oct; 152(4):2150. PubMed ID: 36319248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Time-frequency analyses of transient-evoked stimulus-frequency and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions: testing cochlear model predictions.
    Konrad-Martin D; Keefe DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Oct; 114(4 Pt 1):2021-43. PubMed ID: 14587602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contralateral suppression of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and the middle-ear muscle reflex in human ears.
    Sun XM
    Hear Res; 2008 Mar; 237(1-2):66-75. PubMed ID: 18258398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.