125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1740803)
1. Use of skin staplers in experimental gastrointestinal injuries.
Dawson DL; Coil JA; Jadali M; Garrett G
J Trauma; 1992 Feb; 32(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 1740803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Abdominal wound closure comparing the proximate stapler with sutures.
Lubowski D; Hunt D
Aust N Z J Surg; 1985 Aug; 55(4):405-6. PubMed ID: 3915865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In-continuity gastrointestinal stapling.
Mulholland MW; Magallanes F; Quigley TM; Delaney JP
Dis Colon Rectum; 1983 Sep; 26(9):586-9. PubMed ID: 6347569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Closure of gastrointestinal incisions using skin staples alone and in combination with suture in 29 cats.
Schwartz Z; Coolman BR
J Small Anim Pract; 2018 May; 59(5):281-285. PubMed ID: 29617039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lactomer copolymer absorbable staples in gastrointestinal surgery.
Hirashima T; Eto T; DenBesten L
Am J Surg; 1985 Sep; 150(3):381-5. PubMed ID: 4037202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Skin closure using staples and nylon sutures: a comparison of results.
Stockley I; Elson RA
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1987 Mar; 69(2):76-8. PubMed ID: 3566131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Skin and fascia staple closure.
Waldron DR
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract; 1994 Mar; 24(2):413-23. PubMed ID: 8197678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of staples versus sutures in the repair of penetrating cardiac wounds.
Mayrose J; Jehle DV; Moscati R; Lerner EB; Abrams BJ
J Trauma; 1999 Mar; 46(3):441-3; discussion 443-4. PubMed ID: 10088847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Manual and stapled sutures in digestive surgery: a comparative evaluation].
Negro G; Di Blasio V; Arciero G; Fumo F; De Blasio RA
G Chir; 1992 Apr; 13(4):186-8. PubMed ID: 1637627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of two closure techniques for the repair of experimental colonic perforations.
Edwards DP; Warren BF; Galbraith KA; Watkins PE
Br J Surg; 1999 Apr; 86(4):514-7. PubMed ID: 10215827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Disposable skin staplers for closure of linear gastrointestinal incisions in dogs.
Schwartz Z; Coolman BR
Vet Surg; 2018 Feb; 47(2):285-292. PubMed ID: 29218712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Value of absorbable stapling in digestive surgery? Experimental study comparing TA metallic stapling, TA absorbable stapling and manual sutures].
Lehur PA; Gaillard F; Visset J
J Chir (Paris); 1986 Oct; 123(10):563-9. PubMed ID: 3805171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skin stapling of wounds in the accident department.
MacGregor FB; McCombe AW; King PM; Macleod DA
Injury; 1989 Nov; 20(6):347-8. PubMed ID: 2628331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ex vivo pneumostasis evaluation of a variable-height staple design.
Contini E; Godek ML; Whiffen JM; Bronson DG
Innovations (Phila); 2013; 8(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 24145973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Circular staple anastomoses in the gastrointestinal tract with the staplers SPTU and EEA].
Fasching W; Moritz E
Chirurg; 1980 Oct; 51(10):644-50. PubMed ID: 7438849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of skin stapler in dermatologic surgery.
Stegmaier OC
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1982 Mar; 6(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 7068959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Stenosis complications in digestive surgery: a histomorphological contribution. Comparison of mechanical and manual sutures].
Grassi F; Frateschi C; Caldarelli C; Spisni R; Pingitore R; Cantile C; Cancetti F
Minerva Chir; 1998 Mar; 53(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 9617107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gastrointestinal anastomoses constructed with singly placed staples.
Chung RS
Am J Surg; 1980 Jun; 139(6):876-9. PubMed ID: 6992616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of automatic disposable rotating cartridge skin staplers.
Phung D; Abidin MR; Thacker JG; Rodeheaver GT; Westwater JJ; Doctor A; Edlich RF
J Burn Care Rehabil; 1988; 9(5):538-46. PubMed ID: 3192614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transluminal closure for NOTES: an ex vivo study comparing leak pressures of various gastrotomy and colotomy closure modalities.
Ryou M; Fong DG; Pai RD; Rattner DW; Thompson CC
Endoscopy; 2008 May; 40(5):432-6. PubMed ID: 18404600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
