222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17408381)
1. Finite element analysis of shear stresses at the implant-bone interface of an acetabular press-fit cup during impingement.
Voigt C; Klöhn C; Bader R; von Salis-Soglio G; Scholz R
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Apr; 52(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 17408381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Cementless socket fixation based on the "press-fit" concept in total hip joint arthroplasty].
Morscher EW; Widmer KH; Bereiter H; Elke R; Schenk R
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2002; 69(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 11951572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of under-reaming on the cup/bone interface of a press fit hip replacement.
Zivkovic I; Gonzalez M; Amirouche F
J Biomech Eng; 2010 Apr; 132(4):041008. PubMed ID: 20387971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental evidence of impingement induced strains at the interface and the periphery of an embedded acetabular cup implant.
Arndt C; Voigt C; Steinke H; Salis-Soglio GV; Scholz R
J Biomech Eng; 2012 Jan; 134(1):011007. PubMed ID: 22482662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of loads and prosthesis material properties on the mechanics of the proximal femur after total hip arthroplasty.
Cheal EJ; Spector M; Hayes WC
J Orthop Res; 1992 May; 10(3):405-22. PubMed ID: 1569504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Loss in mechanical contact of cementless acetabular prostheses due to post-operative weight bearing: a biomechanical model.
Bellini CM; Galbusera F; Ceroni RG; Raimondi MT
Med Eng Phys; 2007 Mar; 29(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 16569508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement.
Kluess D; Martin H; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R
Med Eng Phys; 2007 May; 29(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 16901743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Problematic sites of third body embedment in polyethylene for total hip wear acceleration.
Lundberg HJ; Stewart KJ; Pedersen DR; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1208-16. PubMed ID: 15894322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of geometry and abduction angle on the stresses in cemented UHMWPE acetabular cups--finite element simulations and experimental tests.
Korhonen RK; Koistinen A; Konttinen YT; Santavirta SS; Lappalainen R
Biomed Eng Online; 2005 May; 4():32. PubMed ID: 15904521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shape optimization of metal backing for cemented acetabular cup.
Hedia HS; Abdel-Shafi AA; Fouda N
Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 11086841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contact finite element stress analysis of porous ingrowth acetabular cup implantation, ingrowth, and loosening.
Rapperport DJ; Carter DR; Schurman DJ
J Orthop Res; 1987; 5(4):548-61. PubMed ID: 3681529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The possibilities of uncemented glenoid component--a finite element study.
Gupta S; van der Helm FC; van Keulen F
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Mar; 19(3):292-302. PubMed ID: 15003345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does high-flexion total knee arthroplasty promote early loosening of the femoral component?
Zelle J; Janssen D; Van Eijden J; De Waal Malefijt M; Verdonschot N
J Orthop Res; 2011 Jul; 29(7):976-83. PubMed ID: 21308756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Primary stability of uncemented femoral resurfacing implants for varying interface parameters and material formulations during walking and stair climbing.
Rothstock S; Uhlenbrock A; Bishop N; Morlock M
J Biomech; 2010 Feb; 43(3):521-6. PubMed ID: 19913227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of variation of cement thickness on bone and cement stress at the tip of a femoral implant.
Lee IY; Skinner HB; Keyak JH
Iowa Orthop J; 1993; 13():155-9. PubMed ID: 7820736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robust design for acetabular cup stability accounting for patient and surgical variability.
Ong KL; Santner TJ; Bartel DL
J Biomech Eng; 2008 Jun; 130(3):031001. PubMed ID: 18532850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimized design for a novel acetabular component with three wings. A study of finite element analysis.
Ma W; Zhang X; Wang J; Zhang Q; Chen W; Zhang Y
J Surg Res; 2013 Jan; 179(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 22995660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of varus/valgus malalignment on bone strains in the proximal tibia after TKR: an explicit finite element study.
Perillo-Marcone A; Taylor M
J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 17227092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
