BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

703 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17408855)

  • 1. Spatial coincidence modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 417(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 17408855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Audiovisual asynchrony modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Brain Res; 2007 Dec; 1186():224-32. PubMed ID: 18005944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repetition blindness and the Colavita effect.
    Ngo MK; Sinnett S; Soto-Faraco S; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Aug; 480(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 20561565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Seeing the light: exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 180(4):737-54. PubMed ID: 17333012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessing the role of stimulus probability on the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 418(3):266-71. PubMed ID: 17398003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Explaining the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Spence C
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():245-58. PubMed ID: 19733761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Time course of auditory masker effects: tapping the locus of audiovisual integration?
    Steenken R; Diederich A; Colonius H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18355963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unimodal and crossmodal gradients of spatial attention: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Föcker J; Hötting K; Gondan M; Röder B
    Brain Topogr; 2010 Mar; 23(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 19821021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporal order judgments for audiovisual targets embedded in unimodal and bimodal distractor streams.
    Vatakis A; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Nov; 408(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 17010520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Closer in time when farther in space--spatial factors in audiovisual temporal integration.
    Noesselt T; Fendrich R; Bonath B; Tyll S; Heinze HJ
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 25(2):443-58. PubMed ID: 16129586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Semantic congruency and the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Alsius A; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Feb; 184(4):533-46. PubMed ID: 17885751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhanced visual dominance in far space.
    Yue Z; Jiang Y; Li Y; Wang P; Chen Q
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 233(10):2833-43. PubMed ID: 26080757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Attention rivalry under irrelevant audiovisual stimulation.
    Feng T; Qiu Y; Zhu Y; Tong S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jun; 438(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 18482799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multisensory interactions elicited by audiovisual stimuli presented peripherally in a visual attention task: a behavioral and event-related potential study in humans.
    Wu J; Li Q; Bai O; Touge T
    J Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Dec; 26(6):407-13. PubMed ID: 19952565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selective attention to spatial and non-spatial visual stimuli is affected differentially by age: effects on event-related brain potentials and performance data.
    Talsma D; Kok A; Ridderinkhof KR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Nov; 62(2):249-61. PubMed ID: 16806547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of synesthetic associations between the visual and auditory modalities on the Colavita effect.
    Stekelenburg JJ; Keetels M
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1209-19. PubMed ID: 26126803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.