BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17409186)

  • 1. Prevalence of positive selection among nearly neutral amino acid replacements in Drosophila.
    Sawyer SA; Parsch J; Zhang Z; Hartl DL
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Apr; 104(16):6504-10. PubMed ID: 17409186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bayesian analysis suggests that most amino acid replacements in Drosophila are driven by positive selection.
    Sawyer SA; Kulathinal RJ; Bustamante CD; Hartl DL
    J Mol Evol; 2003; 57 Suppl 1():S154-64. PubMed ID: 15008412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inferring the distribution of selective effects from a time inhomogeneous model.
    Amei A; Zhou S
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0194709. PubMed ID: 30657757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The evolution of small insertions and deletions in the coding genes of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Chong Z; Zhai W; Li C; Gao M; Gong Q; Ruan J; Li J; Jiang L; Lv X; Hungate E; Wu CI
    Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Dec; 30(12):2699-708. PubMed ID: 24077769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Similar rates of protein adaptation in Drosophila miranda and D. melanogaster, two species with different current effective population sizes.
    Bachtrog D
    BMC Evol Biol; 2008 Dec; 8():334. PubMed ID: 19091130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effective population size and the efficacy of selection on the X chromosomes of two closely related Drosophila species.
    Andolfatto P; Wong KM; Bachtrog D
    Genome Biol Evol; 2011; 3():114-28. PubMed ID: 21173424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The genomic rate of adaptive amino acid substitution in Drosophila.
    Bierne N; Eyre-Walker A
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Jul; 21(7):1350-60. PubMed ID: 15044594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mutation and selection at silent and replacement sites in the evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA.
    Rand DM; Kann LM
    Genetica; 1998; 102-103(1-6):393-407. PubMed ID: 9720291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rapid evolution and gene-specific patterns of selection for three genes of spermatogenesis in Drosophila.
    Civetta A; Rajakumar SA; Brouwers B; Bacik JP
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Mar; 23(3):655-62. PubMed ID: 16357040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mapping Selection within Drosophila melanogaster Embryo's Anatomy.
    Salvador-Martínez I; Coronado-Zamora M; Castellano D; Barbadilla A; Salazar-Ciudad I
    Mol Biol Evol; 2018 Jan; 35(1):66-79. PubMed ID: 29040697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Differential strengths of positive selection revealed by hitchhiking effects at small physical scales in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Lee YC; Langley CH; Begun DJ
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Apr; 31(4):804-16. PubMed ID: 24361994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Common pattern of evolution of gene expression level and protein sequence in Drosophila.
    Nuzhdin SV; Wayne ML; Harmon KL; McIntyre LM
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Jul; 21(7):1308-17. PubMed ID: 15034135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inference of positive and negative selection on the 5' regulatory regions of Drosophila genes.
    Kohn MH; Fang S; Wu CI
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Feb; 21(2):374-83. PubMed ID: 14660692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recurrent positive selection at bgcn, a key determinant of germ line differentiation, does not appear to be driven by simple coevolution with its partner protein bam.
    Bauer DuMont VL; Flores HA; Wright MH; Aquadro CF
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Jan; 24(1):182-91. PubMed ID: 17056645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating the parameters of selection on nonsynonymous mutations in Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. miranda.
    Haddrill PR; Loewe L; Charlesworth B
    Genetics; 2010 Aug; 185(4):1381-96. PubMed ID: 20516497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hitchhiking effects of recurrent beneficial amino acid substitutions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome.
    Andolfatto P
    Genome Res; 2007 Dec; 17(12):1755-62. PubMed ID: 17989248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distribution of the strength of selection against amino acid replacements in human proteins.
    Yampolsky LY; Kondrashov FA; Kondrashov AS
    Hum Mol Genet; 2005 Nov; 14(21):3191-201. PubMed ID: 16174645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing the neutral theory of molecular evolution with genomic data from Drosophila.
    Fay JC; Wyckoff GJ; Wu CI
    Nature; 2002 Feb; 415(6875):1024-6. PubMed ID: 11875569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Molecular evolution and population genetics of duplicated accessory gland protein genes in Drosophila.
    Holloway AK; Begun DJ
    Mol Biol Evol; 2004 Sep; 21(9):1625-8. PubMed ID: 15215320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptive protein evolution and regulatory divergence in Drosophila.
    Good JM; Hayden CA; Wheeler TJ
    Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Jun; 23(6):1101-3. PubMed ID: 16537654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.