These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17409754)
1. Classifying intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur: does experience matter? Fung W; Jonsson A; Buhren V; Bhandari M Med Princ Pract; 2007; 16(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 17409754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Classification of trochanteric fracture of the proximal femur: a study of the reliability of current systems. Pervez H; Parker MJ; Pryor GA; Lutchman L; Chirodian N Injury; 2002 Oct; 33(8):713-5. PubMed ID: 12213423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of the classification of proximal femur fractures: Does clinical experience matter? Crijns TJ; Janssen SJ; Davis JT; Ring D; Sanchez HB; Injury; 2018 Apr; 49(4):819-823. PubMed ID: 29549969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of classification systems for intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur in experienced orthopaedic surgeons. Jin WJ; Dai LY; Cui YM; Zhou Q; Jiang LS; Lu H Injury; 2005 Jul; 36(7):858-61. PubMed ID: 15949488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Classification of femur trochanteric fracture: Evaluating the reliability of Tang classification. Yin B; He Y; Wang D; Zhou J Injury; 2021 Jun; 52(6):1500-1505. PubMed ID: 33280893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The comparison of two classifications for trochanteric femur fractures: the AO/ASIF classification and the Jensen classification. van Embden D; Rhemrev SJ; Meylaerts SA; Roukema GR Injury; 2010 Apr; 41(4):377-81. PubMed ID: 19906370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of a three-dimensional classification system for intertrochanteric fracture using computed tomography. Wada K; Mikami H; Toki S; Amari R; Takai M; Sairyo K Injury; 2020 Nov; 51(11):2682-2685. PubMed ID: 32718752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The intra- and interobserver reliability of five commonly used intertrochanteric femur fracture classification systems. Yıldırım C; Muratoğlu OG; Turan K; Ergün T; Mısır A; Aydın M Jt Dis Relat Surg; 2022; 33(1):187-192. PubMed ID: 35361094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the new AO/OTA classification of proximal femur fractures. Chan G; Hughes K; Barakat A; Edres K; da Assuncao R; Page P; Dawe E Injury; 2021 Jun; 52(6):1434-1437. PubMed ID: 33097201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Classification of intertrochanteric fractures with computed tomography: a study of intraobserver and interobserver variability and prognostic value. Chapman CB; Herrera MF; Binenbaum G; Schweppe M; Staron RB; Feldman F; Rosenwasser MP Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2003 Sep; 32(9):443-9. PubMed ID: 14560826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional CT Improves the Reproducibility of Stability Evaluation for Intertrochanteric Fractures. Cho YC; Lee PY; Lee CH; Chen CH; Lin YM Orthop Surg; 2018 Aug; 10(3):212-217. PubMed ID: 30152606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical Evaluation of Femoral Head Fractures: Which Classification Systems Have the Best Universality, Reliability, and Reproducibility? Wu S; Qian G; Huang Q; Dou B; Zheng Q; Wang W; Zhu X; Mei J Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2024 Jan; 482(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 37326487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Addition of 3D-CT evaluation to radiographic images and effect on diagnostic reliability of current 2018 AO/OTA classification of femoral trochanteric fractures. Iguchi M; Takahashi T; Matsumura T; Ae R; Hiyama S; Nakashima M; Takeshita K Injury; 2021 Nov; 52(11):3363-3368. PubMed ID: 34598792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does a traction-internal rotation radiograph help to better evaluate fractures of the proximal femur? Koval KJ; Oh CK; Egol KA Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2008; 66(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 18537778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of inter- and intra-observer reliability of current classification systems for subtrochanteric femoral fractures. İmerci A; Aydogan NH; Tosun K Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2018 Apr; 28(3):499-502. PubMed ID: 29110093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High reliability in classification of tibia fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register. Wennergren D; Ekholm C; Sundfeldt M; Karlsson J; Bhandari M; Möller M Injury; 2016 Feb; 47(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 26620119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Impact of Three-Dimensional CT Imaging on Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of Proximal Humeral Fracture Classifications and Treatment Recommendations. Berkes MB; Dines JS; Little MT; Garner MR; Shifflett GD; Lazaro LE; Wellman DS; Dines DM; Lorich DG J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Aug; 96(15):1281-1286. PubMed ID: 25100775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the Inter and Intra-Observer Reliability of the AO Classification of Intertrochanteric Fractures and the Device Choice (DHS, PFNA, and DCS) of Fixations. Zarie M; Mohamoud MF; Farhoud AR; Bagheri N; Khan FMY; Heshmatifar M; Klantar H Ethiop J Health Sci; 2020 Sep; 30(5):755-760. PubMed ID: 33911837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of the AO/ASIF classification for pertrochanteric femoral fractures. Schipper IB; Steyerberg EW; Castelein RM; van Vugt AB Acta Orthop Scand; 2001 Feb; 72(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 11327411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The internal rotation traction radiograph does not improve the reliability in the AO classification system for pertrochanteric fractures. An inter- and intra-observer reliability assessment. Perez-Abdala JI; Huespe I; Vildoza S; Novillo M; Llano L; Carabelli G; Taype D; Sancineto C; Barla J Injury; 2023 Nov; 54 Suppl 6():110779. PubMed ID: 38143126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]