157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17409754)
1. Classifying intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur: does experience matter?
Fung W; Jonsson A; Buhren V; Bhandari M
Med Princ Pract; 2007; 16(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 17409754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Classification of trochanteric fracture of the proximal femur: a study of the reliability of current systems.
Pervez H; Parker MJ; Pryor GA; Lutchman L; Chirodian N
Injury; 2002 Oct; 33(8):713-5. PubMed ID: 12213423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of the classification of proximal femur fractures: Does clinical experience matter?
Crijns TJ; Janssen SJ; Davis JT; Ring D; Sanchez HB;
Injury; 2018 Apr; 49(4):819-823. PubMed ID: 29549969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of classification systems for intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur in experienced orthopaedic surgeons.
Jin WJ; Dai LY; Cui YM; Zhou Q; Jiang LS; Lu H
Injury; 2005 Jul; 36(7):858-61. PubMed ID: 15949488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Classification of femur trochanteric fracture: Evaluating the reliability of Tang classification.
Yin B; He Y; Wang D; Zhou J
Injury; 2021 Jun; 52(6):1500-1505. PubMed ID: 33280893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The comparison of two classifications for trochanteric femur fractures: the AO/ASIF classification and the Jensen classification.
van Embden D; Rhemrev SJ; Meylaerts SA; Roukema GR
Injury; 2010 Apr; 41(4):377-81. PubMed ID: 19906370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional CT Improves the Reproducibility of Stability Evaluation for Intertrochanteric Fractures.
Cho YC; Lee PY; Lee CH; Chen CH; Lin YM
Orthop Surg; 2018 Aug; 10(3):212-217. PubMed ID: 30152606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of a three-dimensional classification system for intertrochanteric fracture using computed tomography.
Wada K; Mikami H; Toki S; Amari R; Takai M; Sairyo K
Injury; 2020 Nov; 51(11):2682-2685. PubMed ID: 32718752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The intra- and interobserver reliability of five commonly used intertrochanteric femur fracture classification systems.
Yıldırım C; Muratoğlu OG; Turan K; Ergün T; Mısır A; Aydın M
Jt Dis Relat Surg; 2022; 33(1):187-192. PubMed ID: 35361094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of the new AO/OTA classification of proximal femur fractures.
Chan G; Hughes K; Barakat A; Edres K; da Assuncao R; Page P; Dawe E
Injury; 2021 Jun; 52(6):1434-1437. PubMed ID: 33097201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Classification of intertrochanteric fractures with computed tomography: a study of intraobserver and interobserver variability and prognostic value.
Chapman CB; Herrera MF; Binenbaum G; Schweppe M; Staron RB; Feldman F; Rosenwasser MP
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2003 Sep; 32(9):443-9. PubMed ID: 14560826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Addition of 3D-CT evaluation to radiographic images and effect on diagnostic reliability of current 2018 AO/OTA classification of femoral trochanteric fractures.
Iguchi M; Takahashi T; Matsumura T; Ae R; Hiyama S; Nakashima M; Takeshita K
Injury; 2021 Nov; 52(11):3363-3368. PubMed ID: 34598792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does a traction-internal rotation radiograph help to better evaluate fractures of the proximal femur?
Koval KJ; Oh CK; Egol KA
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2008; 66(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 18537778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of inter- and intra-observer reliability of current classification systems for subtrochanteric femoral fractures.
İmerci A; Aydogan NH; Tosun K
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2018 Apr; 28(3):499-502. PubMed ID: 29110093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High reliability in classification of tibia fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register.
Wennergren D; Ekholm C; Sundfeldt M; Karlsson J; Bhandari M; Möller M
Injury; 2016 Feb; 47(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 26620119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Impact of Three-Dimensional CT Imaging on Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of Proximal Humeral Fracture Classifications and Treatment Recommendations.
Berkes MB; Dines JS; Little MT; Garner MR; Shifflett GD; Lazaro LE; Wellman DS; Dines DM; Lorich DG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Aug; 96(15):1281-1286. PubMed ID: 25100775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the Inter and Intra-Observer Reliability of the AO Classification of Intertrochanteric Fractures and the Device Choice (DHS, PFNA, and DCS) of Fixations.
Zarie M; Mohamoud MF; Farhoud AR; Bagheri N; Khan FMY; Heshmatifar M; Klantar H
Ethiop J Health Sci; 2020 Sep; 30(5):755-760. PubMed ID: 33911837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of the AO/ASIF classification for pertrochanteric femoral fractures.
Schipper IB; Steyerberg EW; Castelein RM; van Vugt AB
Acta Orthop Scand; 2001 Feb; 72(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 11327411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The internal rotation traction radiograph does not improve the reliability in the AO classification system for pertrochanteric fractures. An inter- and intra-observer reliability assessment.
Perez-Abdala JI; Huespe I; Vildoza S; Novillo M; Llano L; Carabelli G; Taype D; Sancineto C; Barla J
Injury; 2023 Nov; 54 Suppl 6():110779. PubMed ID: 38143126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The new AO classification system for intertrochanteric fractures allows better agreement than the original AO classification. An inter- and intra-observer agreement evaluation.
Klaber I; Besa P; Sandoval F; Lobos D; Zamora T; Schweitzer D; Urrutia J
Injury; 2021 Jan; 52(1):102-105. PubMed ID: 32654847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
