These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17410411)
1. Regularities in eyewitness identification. Clark SE; Howell RT; Davey SL Law Hum Behav; 2008 Jun; 32(3):187-218. PubMed ID: 17410411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the diagnosticity of multiple-witness identifications. Clark SE; Wells GL Law Hum Behav; 2008 Oct; 32(5):406-22. PubMed ID: 18095147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups. Wright DB Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates. Brewer N; Wells GL J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Mar; 12(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16536656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments. Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Archival analyses of eyewitness identification test outcomes: what can they tell us about eyewitness memory? Horry R; Halford P; Brewer N; Milne R; Bull R Law Hum Behav; 2014 Feb; 38(1):94-108. PubMed ID: 24127889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PC_Eyewitness and the sequential superiority effect: computer-based lineup administration. MacLin OH; Zimmerman LA; Malpass RS Law Hum Behav; 2005 Jun; 29(3):303-21. PubMed ID: 15965630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving eyewitness identification accuracy by screening out those who say they don't know. Weber N; Perfect TJ Law Hum Behav; 2012 Feb; 36(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 22471383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lineup composition, suspect position, and the sequential lineup advantage. Carlson CA; Gronlund SD; Clark SE J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Jun; 14(2):118-128. PubMed ID: 18590368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification. Clark SE Law Hum Behav; 2005 Aug; 29(4):395-424. PubMed ID: 16133947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Phenotypic mismatch between suspects and fillers but not phenotypic bias increases eyewitness identifications of Black suspects. Jones JM; Katzman J; Kovera MB Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1233782. PubMed ID: 38680285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A re-examination of the effects of biased lineup instructions in eyewitness identification. Clark SE Law Hum Behav; 2005 Oct; 29(5):575-604. PubMed ID: 16254744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does methodology matter in eyewitness identification research? The effect of live versus video exposure on eyewitness identification accuracy. Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Panton T Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 18790535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sequential lineup laps and eyewitness accuracy. Steblay NK; Dietrich HL; Ryan SL; Raczynski JL; James KA Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):262-74. PubMed ID: 20632113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Field experiments on eyewitness identification: towards a better understanding of pitfalls and prospects. Wells GL Law Hum Behav; 2008 Feb; 32(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 17610051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Eyewitness lineups: is the appearance-change instruction a good idea? Charman SD; Wells GL Law Hum Behav; 2007 Feb; 31(1):3-22. PubMed ID: 16612580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What we know now: the Evanston Illinois field lineups. Steblay NK Law Hum Behav; 2011 Feb; 35(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 20177754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]