341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17410798)
1. Effect of flux (transmembrane pressure) and membrane properties on fouling and rejection of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes treating perfluorooctane sulfonate containing wastewater.
Tang CY; Fu QS; Criddle CS; Leckie JO
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Mar; 41(6):2008-14. PubMed ID: 17410798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of reverse osmosis membranes to remove perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) from semiconductor wastewater.
Tang CY; Fu QS; Robertson AP; Criddle CS; Leckie JO
Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Dec; 40(23):7343-9. PubMed ID: 17180987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Removal of bisphenol A (BPA) from water by various nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes.
Yüksel S; Kabay N; Yüksel M
J Hazard Mater; 2013 Dec; 263 Pt 2():307-10. PubMed ID: 23731784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Distillery wastewater treatment by the membrane-based nanofiltration and reverse osmosis processes.
Nataraj SK; Hosamani KM; Aminabhavi TM
Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(12):2349-56. PubMed ID: 16757012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cake-enhanced concentration polarization: a new fouling mechanism for salt-rejecting membranes.
Hoek EM; Elimelech M
Environ Sci Technol; 2003 Dec; 37(24):5581-8. PubMed ID: 14717167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dyeing wastewater effluent treatment.
Myung SW; Choi IH; Lee SH; Kim IC; Lee KH
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):159-64. PubMed ID: 16003974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rotating reverse osmosis: a dynamic model for flux and rejection.
Lee S; Lueptow RM
J Memb Sci; 2001 Oct; 192(2):129-43. PubMed ID: 11757575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of commercial nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane filtration to remove per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS): Effects of transmembrane pressures and water matrices.
Ma Q; Lei Q; Liu F; Song Z; Khusid B; Zhang W
Water Environ Res; 2024 Feb; 96(2):e10983. PubMed ID: 38291820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reverse osmosis membrane rejection for ersatz space mission wastewaters.
Yoon Y; Lueptow RM
Water Res; 2005 Sep; 39(14):3298-308. PubMed ID: 16005043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterization and effect of biofouling on polyamide reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane surfaces.
Khan MM; Stewart PS; Moll DJ; Mickols WE; Nelson SE; Camper AK
Biofouling; 2011 Feb; 27(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 21253926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Design considerations for wastewater treatment by reverse osmosis.
Bartels CR; Wilf M; Andes K; Iong J
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):473-82. PubMed ID: 16004010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Removal of organic micro-pollutants (phenol, aniline and nitrobenzene) via forward osmosis (FO) process: Evaluation of FO as an alternative method to reverse osmosis (RO).
Cui Y; Liu XY; Chung TS; Weber M; Staudt C; Maletzko C
Water Res; 2016 Mar; 91():104-14. PubMed ID: 26773492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental study of water and salt fluxes through reverse osmosis membranes.
Zhou W; Song L
Environ Sci Technol; 2005 May; 39(9):3382-7. PubMed ID: 15926593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Membrane filtration for tertiary treatment of biologically treated effluents from the pulp and paper industry.
Mänttäri M; Nyström M
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 55(6):99-107. PubMed ID: 17486840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes.
Herzberg M; Kang S; Elimelech M
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Jun; 43(12):4393-8. PubMed ID: 19603652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of feed water pH and membrane material on nanofiltration of perfluorohexanoic acid in aqueous solution.
Zeng C; Tanaka S; Suzuki Y; Fujii S
Chemosphere; 2017 Sep; 183():599-604. PubMed ID: 28575703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the hybrid system combining electrocoagulation, nanofiltration and reverse osmosis for biologically treated textile effluent: Treatment efficiency and membrane fouling.
Güneş E; Gönder ZB
J Environ Manage; 2021 Sep; 294():113042. PubMed ID: 34126531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Removal of phenol from coke-oven wastewater by cross-flow nanofiltration membranes.
Kumar R; Pal P
Water Environ Res; 2013 May; 85(5):447-55. PubMed ID: 23789574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of residual organic macromolecules produced in biological wastewater treatment processes on removal of pharmaceuticals by NF/RO membranes.
Kimura K; Iwase T; Kita S; Watanabe Y
Water Res; 2009 Aug; 43(15):3751-8. PubMed ID: 19564034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
