152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17410905)
1. Comparison of the compressive strength of 3 different implant design systems.
Pedroza JE; Torrealba Y; Elias A; Psoter W
J Oral Implantol; 2007; 33(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 17410905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An in vitro load evaluation of a conical implant system with 2 abutment designs and 3 different retaining-screw alloys.
Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Karlsson S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):733-7. PubMed ID: 17066634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Compressive Strength Evaluation of Three Distinct Implant Design Approaches.
Sahoo PK; Priyadarshini SR; Das AC; Panda S; Choudhury P; Swain P
J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2023 Jul; 15(Suppl 2):S1126-S1128. PubMed ID: 37694095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implant-abutment interface design affects fatigue and fracture strength of implants.
Steinebrunner L; Wolfart S; Ludwig K; Kern M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1276-84. PubMed ID: 19040443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The spline implant: design, engineering, and evaluation.
Binon PP
Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(5):419-33. PubMed ID: 9108742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Load fatigue performance of conical implant-abutment connections.
Seetoh YL; Tan KB; Chua EK; Quek HC; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):797-806. PubMed ID: 21841990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Load fatigue performance of four implant-abutment interface designs: effect of torque level and implant system.
Quek HC; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 18548921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standard-diameter hex-type implants.
Hoyer SA; Stanford CM; Buranadham S; Fridrich T; Wagner J; Gratton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jun; 85(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 11404760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Micromotion and dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface.
Gratton DG; Aquilino SA; Stanford CM
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 11174678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro evaluation of reverse torque value of abutment screw and marginal opening in a screw- and cement-retained implant fixed partial denture design.
Kim SG; Park JU; Jeong JH; Bae C; Bae TS; Chee W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1061-7. PubMed ID: 20162110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of repeated torque/mechanical loading cycles on two different abutment types in implants with internal tapered connections: an in vitro study.
Ricciardi Coppedê A; de Mattos Mda G; Rodrigues RC; Ribeiro RF
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):624-32. PubMed ID: 19281502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Resistance of internal-connection implant connectors under rotational fatigue loading.
Wiskott HW; Jaquet R; Scherrer SS; Belser UC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(2):249-57. PubMed ID: 17465350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture strength and failure mode of five different single-tooth implant-abutment combinations.
Strub JR; Gerds T
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):167-71. PubMed ID: 12737249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing.
Cibirka RM; Nelson SK; Lang BR; Rueggeberg FA
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 11264934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Wave analysis of implant screw loosening using an air cylindrical cyclic loading device.
Lee J; Kim YS; Kim CW; Han JS
J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):402-8. PubMed ID: 12447217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Load fatigue performance of implant-ceramic abutment combinations.
Nguyen HQ; Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):636-46. PubMed ID: 19885403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of screw retention of nine abutment systems: a pilot study.
Schulte JK; Coffey J
Implant Dent; 1997; 6(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 9206402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implant-abutment screw joint preload of 7 hex-top abutment systems.
Tan KB; Nicholls JI
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):367-77. PubMed ID: 11432656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the ITI Morse taper implant/abutment design with an internal modification.
Ding TA; Woody RD; Higginbottom FL; Miller BH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):865-72. PubMed ID: 14696662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fracture resistance of the implant-abutment connection in implants with internal hex and internal conical connections under oblique compressive loading: an in vitro study.
Coppedê AR; Bersani E; de Mattos Mda G; Rodrigues RC; Sartori IA; Ribeiro RF
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):283-6. PubMed ID: 19548411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
