BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17411718)

  • 1. The appropriateness of employing imaging screening technologies: report of the methods committee of the ACR task force on screening technologies.
    Hillman BJ; Black WC; D'orsi C; Hauser JB; Smith R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Nov; 1(11):861-4. PubMed ID: 17411718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer.
    Lee CH; Dershaw DD; Kopans D; Evans P; Monsees B; Monticciolo D; Brenner RJ; Bassett L; Berg W; Feig S; Hendrick E; Mendelson E; D'Orsi C; Sickles E; Burhenne LW
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Jan; 7(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 20129267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based radiology and the ACR Appropriateness Criteria.
    Blackmore CC; Medina LS
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jul; 3(7):505-9. PubMed ID: 17412113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® on nonpalpable mammographic findings (excluding calcifications).
    Newell MS; Birdwell RL; D'Orsi CJ; Bassett LW; Mahoney MC; Bailey L; Berg WA; Harvey JA; Herman CR; Kaplan SS; Liberman L; Mendelson EB; Parikh JR; Rabinovitch R; Rosen EL; Sutherland ML
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Dec; 7(12):920-30. PubMed ID: 21129682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group.
    ; ; ; ; ; ;
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Oct; 3(10):751-71. PubMed ID: 17412166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening for breast cancer: current recommendations and future directions.
    Knutson D; Steiner E
    Am Fam Physician; 2007 Jun; 75(11):1660-6. PubMed ID: 17575656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preventive Cardiology: the SHAPE of the future. A Synopsis from the Screening for Heart Attack Prevention and Education (SHAPE) Task Force report.
    Naghavi M
    Herz; 2007 Aug; 32(5):356-61. PubMed ID: 17687524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New tools from the ACR (American College of Radiology): appropriateness criteria and utilization analysis.
    Vydareny KH
    Radiol Manage; 1997; 19(2):40-5. PubMed ID: 10166746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality of life and diagnostic imaging outcomes.
    Seidenwurm D; Rosenberg R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Apr; 7(4):265-8. PubMed ID: 20362941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The diffusion of new imaging technologies: a molecular imaging prospective.
    Hillman BJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jan; 3(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 17412004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ACR clinical statement on noninvasive cardiac imaging.
    Weinreb JC; Larson PA; Woodard PK; Stanford W; Rubin GD; Stillman AE; Bluemke DA; Duerinckx AJ; Dunnick NR; Smith GG
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jun; 2(6):471-7. PubMed ID: 17411862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Should you screen--or not? The latest recommendations.
    Campos-Outcalt D
    J Fam Pract; 2008 Jul; 57(7):469-72. PubMed ID: 18625170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MRI and mammography surveillance of women at increased risk for breast cancer: recommendations using an evidence-based approach.
    Granader EJ; Dwamena B; Carlos RC
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Dec; 15(12):1590-5. PubMed ID: 19000876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic radiology reporting and communication: the ACR guideline.
    Kushner DC; Lucey LL;
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jan; 2(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 17411755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Revised practice guideline 'Screening and diagnosis of breast cancer'].
    Zonderland HM; Tuut MK; den Heeten GJ; Asperen CJ; de Bock GH; Rutqers EJ; Westenend PJ; Smit GM; Benraadt J
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Oct; 152(43):2336-9. PubMed ID: 19024064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Progress in prevention: should we screen for risk factors or disease? A current debate in the prevention of cardiovascular events.
    Dennison CR; Hughes S
    J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2009; 24(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 19114796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The ACR appropriateness criteria: translation to practice and research.
    Sistrom CL
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jan; 2(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 17411762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The development and meaning of appropriateness guidelines.
    Mendelson EB
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1081-4. PubMed ID: 7480657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screening and prevention of breast cancer in primary care.
    Tice JA; Kerlikowske K
    Prim Care; 2009 Sep; 36(3):533-58. PubMed ID: 19616154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of neck pain and its associated disorders: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders.
    Nordin M; Carragee EJ; Hogg-Johnson S; Weiner SS; Hurwitz EL; Peloso PM; Guzman J; van der Velde G; Carroll LJ; Holm LW; Côté P; Cassidy JD; Haldeman S;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Feb; 33(4 Suppl):S101-22. PubMed ID: 18204385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.