209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17411751)
1. Valid clinical research and reimbursement for what we do.
Hillman BJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jan; 2(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 17411751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Blue Cross Blue Shield Association Technology Evaluation Center: how we evaluate radiology technologies.
Ziegler KM; Flamm CR; Aronson N
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jan; 2(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 17411757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. From medical invention to clinical practice: the reimbursement challenge facing new device procedures and technology--part 2: coverage.
Raab GG; Parr DH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Oct; 3(10):772-7. PubMed ID: 17412167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ensuring technological competence and leadership in medicine.
McGivney WT
Physician Exec; 1993; 19(1):50-1. PubMed ID: 10125939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Harmonization of evidence requirements for health technology assessment in reimbursement decision making.
Hutton J; Trueman P; Facey K
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):511-7. PubMed ID: 18828948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Technology assessment: approach and reimbursement.
Yaszemski MJ; Polly DW; Boden SD; Andersson GB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(11 Suppl):S39-43. PubMed ID: 17495585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interview: a 20-year 'search for evidence' leads to the Center for Medical Technology Policy.
Tunis SR
J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Jan; 3(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 24345252
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Centers tapped to evaluate technology.
Moore JD
Mod Healthc; 1997 Sep; 27(38):20, 22. PubMed ID: 10170392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Closer inspection: the recent evolution of technology assessment.
Goodman CS
Health Syst Rev; 1997; 30(2):38-40, 42, 44. PubMed ID: 10165990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. National Authority for Health: France.
Rochaix L; Xerri B
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund); 2009 Jul; 58():1-9. PubMed ID: 19639712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Managing medical technology and business opportunities.
Sarma RK; Kapoor P; Gupta AK
J Acad Hosp Adm; 1996 Jul-1997 Jan; 8-9(2-1):57-61. PubMed ID: 10166964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical research in trauma and orthopaedic surgery--call for action.
Giannoudis PV; Stengel D
Injury; 2008 Jun; 39(6):627-30. PubMed ID: 18508056
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical technology and the reimbursement dilemma.
Dragalin D
Internist; 1992 Oct; 33(9):12-4. PubMed ID: 10121371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reimbursement disputes involving experimental medical treatment.
Molino PJ
J Health Hosp Law; 1991 Nov; 24(11):329-36, 343, 359. PubMed ID: 10114834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Response to economic forces buffeting the community of neurosurgery.
Bean JR
Clin Neurosurg; 2009; 56():70-1. PubMed ID: 20214035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Critical review and appraisal of published clinical literature: useful skill in biotechnology product development.
Foote M
Biotechnol Annu Rev; 2008; 14():403-10. PubMed ID: 18606371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Care to compare?
Aston G
Hosp Health Netw; 2008 Dec; 82(12):38-41, 1. PubMed ID: 19209502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Coverage with evidence development: a very good beginning, but much to be done. Commentary to Hutton et al.
Tunis SR; Chalkidou K
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2007; 23(4):432-5. PubMed ID: 17937830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Experimental therapy--who shall pay?
N Engl J Med; 1991 May; 324(18):1291-2. PubMed ID: 2014045
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Current technology assessment programs/procedures.
McDonough R
J Laparoendosc Surg; 1993 Aug; 3(4):395-7. PubMed ID: 8268513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
