These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17411840)
1. Why would anyone (in his or her right mind) want to do breast imaging? Jackson VP J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 May; 2(5):391-3. PubMed ID: 17411840 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Mammography screening is not as good as we hoped. Jørgensen KJ Maturitas; 2010 Jan; 65(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 19939593 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Unaccounted breast cancers do not infer regression of tumors. Chu DZ Arch Intern Med; 2009 May; 169(10):999. PubMed ID: 19468100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography readers and their memory performance have no correlation with each other. Kok P; Pitman AG; Cawson JN; Gledhill S; Kremer S; Lawson J; Mehta K; Mercuri V; Shnier D; Taft R; Zentner L J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2010 Aug; 54(4):315-24. PubMed ID: 20718911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Blind faith]. Zwaveling A Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1978 Jun; 122(25):889-91. PubMed ID: 662039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Observer variability in mammography. Howard DH; Elmore JG; Lee CH; Wells CK; Feinstein AR Trans Assoc Am Physicians; 1993; 106():96-100. PubMed ID: 8036750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Update on breast imaging. New imaging techniques have led to advances in breast cancer detection. What does that mean for the annual mammogram? Harv Womens Health Watch; 2003 Jun; 10(10):4-6. PubMed ID: 12835158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Over-diagnosis in breast cancer screening. Møller H; Davies E BMJ; 2006 Mar; 332(7543):691-2. PubMed ID: 16517549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Is overdiagnosing with 50 percent in mammography screening acceptable?]. Zahl PH; Maehlen J Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Jan; 127(2):207-8; author reply 208. PubMed ID: 17237877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Advances in breast imaging. Although mammography remains standard for breast cancer screening, several newer technologies are helping to fine-tune diagnosis. Harv Womens Health Watch; 2010 May; 17(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 20593556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Current realities of delivering mammography services in the community: do challenges with staffing and scheduling exist? D'Orsi C; Tu SP; Nakano C; Carney PA; Abraham LA; Taplin SH; Hendrick RE; Cutter GR; Berns E; Barlow WE; Elmore JG Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):391-5. PubMed ID: 15798153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lessons learned from reviewing breast imaging malpractice cases. Arleo EK; Saleh M; Rosenblatt R J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Dec; 11(12 Pt A):1186-8. PubMed ID: 24889476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. System malfunction. Avery JK Tenn Med; 2009 Oct; 102(10):31. PubMed ID: 19899316 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Contribution of mammography to the early diagnosis of breast cancer]. Hermanutz KD Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1974 Oct; 99(43):2180-2. PubMed ID: 4430279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammography: a surgeon's experience. Devitt JE Can Med Assoc J; 1979 Jun; 120(11):1370-72. PubMed ID: 222420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Missed breast carcinoma: pitfalls and pearls. Majid AS; de Paredes ES; Doherty RD; Sharma NR; Salvador X Radiographics; 2003; 23(4):881-95. PubMed ID: 12853663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammography and the risks of engagement. Pentecost MJ J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Nov; 1(11):797-9. PubMed ID: 17411707 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Re: "Mammography and the risks of engagement". Goldshein M J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jan; 2(1):93-4. PubMed ID: 17411771 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]