BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

603 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17411865)

  • 41. Disparities and trends in sentinel lymph node biopsy among early-stage breast cancer patients (1998-2005).
    Chen AY; Halpern MT; Schrag NM; Stewart A; Leitch M; Ward E
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Apr; 100(7):462-74. PubMed ID: 18364506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Family physicians' referral decisions: results from the ASPN referral study.
    Forrest CB; Nutting PA; Starfield B; von Schrader S
    J Fam Pract; 2002 Mar; 51(3):215-22. PubMed ID: 11978231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Breast imaging and needle biopsy in women with clinically evident breast cancer: does combined imaging change overall diagnostic sensitivity?
    Ciatto S; Houssami N
    Breast; 2007 Aug; 16(4):382-6. PubMed ID: 17350262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The management of gout at an academic healthcare center in Beijing: a physician survey.
    Fang W; Zeng X; Li M; Chen LX; Schumacher HR; Zhang F
    J Rheumatol; 2006 Oct; 33(10):2041-9. PubMed ID: 17014019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Palpable masses in breast during lactation.
    Obenauer S; Dammert S
    Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 17189838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Physician practice volume and alternative surgical treatment for breast cancer in Florida.
    Luther SL; Studnicki J
    Health Serv Res; 2001 Dec; 36(6 Pt 2):166-79. PubMed ID: 16148967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Clinical decision-making and mammography referral.
    Grady KE; Lemkau JP; McVay JM; Carlson S; Lee N; Minchella M; Caddell C
    Prev Med; 1996; 25(3):327-38. PubMed ID: 8781011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Factors influencing mammogram ordering at the time of the office visit.
    Conry CM; Main DS; Miller RS; Iverson DC; Calonge BN
    J Fam Pract; 1993 Oct; 37(4):356-60. PubMed ID: 8409889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Physician management preferences for cardiac patients: factors affecting referral to cardiac rehabilitation.
    Grace SL; Evindar A; Abramson BL; Stewart DE
    Can J Cardiol; 2004 Sep; 20(11):1101-7. PubMed ID: 15457306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Family physicians' initiative to increase compliance with screening mammography--an innovative community project.
    Eilat-Tsanani S; Sorek M; Gay N; Chaimovitch O; Kulton L; Tabenkin H
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2001 Dec; 3(12):920-4. PubMed ID: 11794915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Surveillance testing among survivors of early-stage breast cancer.
    Keating NL; Landrum MB; Guadagnoli E; Winer EP; Ayanian JZ
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Mar; 25(9):1074-81. PubMed ID: 17369571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Factors associated with open practices: results from the Canadian National Family Physician Survey.
    Woodward CA; Pong RW
    Can Fam Physician; 2006 Jan; 52(1):66-7. PubMed ID: 16926967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Effect on biopsy technique of the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) for nonpalpable mammographic abnormalities.
    Ball CG; Butchart M; MacFarlane JK
    Can J Surg; 2002 Aug; 45(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 12174979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The consultation and referral process. A report from NEON. Northeastern Ohio Network Research Group.
    Bourguet C; Gilchrist V; McCord G
    J Fam Pract; 1998 Jan; 46(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 9451370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Breast biopsy utilization: a population-based study.
    Ghosh K; Melton LJ; Suman VJ; Grant CS; Sterioff S; Brandt KR; Branch C; Sellers TA; Hartmann LC
    Arch Intern Med; 2005 Jul; 165(14):1593-8. PubMed ID: 16043676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Factors affecting breast cancer risk reduction practices among California physicians.
    Kaplan CP; Haas JS; PĂ©rez-Stable EJ; Des Jarlais G; Gregorich SE
    Prev Med; 2005 Jul; 41(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 15916987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of breast lesions].
    Fan ZQ; Ouyang T; Wang TF; Li JF; Xie YT; Fan T; Zhang Z; Lin BY
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Sep; 45(17):1185-7. PubMed ID: 18067713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The reliability of fine-needle aspiration biopsy as the initial diagnostic procedure for palpable masses: a 4-year experience of 730 patients from a community hospital-based outpatient aspiration biopsy clinic.
    Florentine BD; Staymates B; Rabadi M; Barstis J; Black A;
    Cancer; 2006 Jul; 107(2):406-16. PubMed ID: 16773630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [MRI-guided biopsy of suspicious abnormalities in the breast].
    Meeuwis C; van den Bosch MA; Houwert KA; Fernandez-Gallardo AM; van Hillegersberg R; Mali WP
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2006 Aug; 150(32):1780-7. PubMed ID: 16948241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Use of breast core biopsy in the United States: results of a national survey.
    March DE; Raslavicus A; Coughlin BF; Klein SV; Makari-Judson G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Sep; 169(3):697-701. PubMed ID: 9275881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.