603 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17411865)
61. Variation in screening mammography and Papanicolaou smear by primary care physician specialty and gatekeeper plan (United States).
Haggstrom DA; Phillips KA; Liang SY; Haas JS; Tye S; Kerlikowske K
Cancer Causes Control; 2004 Nov; 15(9):883-92. PubMed ID: 15577290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Compliance with screening mammography. Survey of primary care physicians.
Roetzheim RG; Van Durme DJ; Brownlee HJ; Herold AH; Pamies RJ; Woodard L
J Fla Med Assoc; 1991 Jul; 78(7):426-9. PubMed ID: 1919495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Patterns and correlates of patient referral to surgeons for treatment of breast cancer.
Katz SJ; Hofer TP; Hawley S; Lantz PM; Janz NK; Schwartz K; Liu L; Deapen D; Morrow M
J Clin Oncol; 2007 Jan; 25(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 17235044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Cancer yield of probably benign breast MR examinations.
Eby PR; Demartini WB; Peacock S; Rosen EL; Lauro B; Lehman CD
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):950-5. PubMed ID: 17896380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. A decade of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: trends in the preoperative diagnosis of breast cancer.
Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Roumen RM; de Koning HJ; Plaisier ML; Fracheboud J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Nov; 106(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 17219049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Patterns of hematuria referral to urologists: does a gender disparity exist?
Johnson EK; Daignault S; Zhang Y; Lee CT
Urology; 2008 Sep; 72(3):498-502; discussion 502-3. PubMed ID: 18619657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. [Needle aspiration cytology of the breast: current perspective on the role in diagnosis and management].
Kocjan G
Acta Med Croatica; 2008 Oct; 62(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 19205416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. [Neddle-guided biopsy in the diagnosis of non-palpable breast cancer].
Becerra-Alcántara GI; Círigo-Villagómez LL; Ramos-Medina F; Robledo-Martínez H; Mar-Merinos CG; Panzi-Altamirano RM
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2015 Jul; 83(7):400-7. PubMed ID: 26422910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Primary care physician specialty referral decision making: patient, physician, and health care system determinants.
Forrest CB; Nutting PA; von Schrader S; Rohde C; Starfield B
Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 16495203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. [Diagnostic value of a breast MRI score for the prediction of malignancy of breast lesions detected solely with MRI].
Siegmann KC; Moron HU; Baur A; Hahn M; Vogel U; Claussen CD; Bitzer M
Rofo; 2009 Jun; 181(6):556-63. PubMed ID: 19452398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Under utilisation of the 2-week wait initiative for lung cancer by primary care and its effect on the urgent referral pathway.
Lewis NR; Le Jeune I; Baldwin DR
Br J Cancer; 2005 Oct; 93(8):905-8. PubMed ID: 16189521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. The association between physician risk tolerance and imaging use in abdominal pain.
Pines JM; Hollander JE; Isserman JA; Chen EH; Dean AJ; Shofer FS; Mills AM
Am J Emerg Med; 2009 Jun; 27(5):552-7. PubMed ID: 19497460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Percutaneous liver biopsy practice patterns among pediatric gastroenterologists in North America.
Banerjee S; Bishop W; Valim C; Mahoney LB; Lightdale JR
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr; 2007 Jul; 45(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 17592369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Screening breast MR imaging: comparison of interpretation of baseline and annual follow-up studies.
Abramovici G; Mainiero MB
Radiology; 2011 Apr; 259(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 21285337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Referrals for alternative therapies.
Borkan J; Neher JO; Anson O; Smoker B
J Fam Pract; 1994 Dec; 39(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 7798857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Exploring factors that affect hospital referral in rural settings: a case study from Norway.
Gjessing K; Faresjö T
Rural Remote Health; 2009; 9(1):975. PubMed ID: 19199374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Screening mammography rates by specialty of the usual care physician.
Finison KS; Wellins CA; Wennberg DE; Lucas FL
Eff Clin Pract; 1999; 2(3):120-5. PubMed ID: 10538260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Why are patients noncompliant with follow-up recommendations after MRI-guided core needle biopsy of suspicious breast lesions?
Thompson MO; Lipson J; Daniel B; Harrigal C; Mullarkey P; Pal S; Thompson AC; Ikeda D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Dec; 201(6):1391-400. PubMed ID: 24261382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Screening mammography referral rates for women ages 50 to 69 years by recently-licensed family physicians: physician and practice environment correlates.
Haggerty J; Tamblyn R; Abrahamowicz M; Beaulieu MD; Kishchuk N
Prev Med; 1999 Nov; 29(5):391-404. PubMed ID: 10564631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. [The experiences of a hospital radiology department with outside referrals for the preoperative marking of suspicious breast lesions].
Helbich TH; Mostbeck GH; Zontsich T; Heinz-Peer G; Cervenka P; Wohlschlager H; Fitzal P; Wolf G
Rofo; 1995 Jun; 162(6):492-6. PubMed ID: 7605961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
