These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17411953)

  • 1. Re: "Technology evaluation center assessment synopsis: use of magnetic resonance imaging to avoid a biopsy in women with suspicious primary breast lesions".
    Savoca CJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Oct; 2(10):869; author reply 869-70. PubMed ID: 17411953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technology Evaluation Center assessment synopsis: use of magnetic resonance imaging to avoid a biopsy in women with suspicious primary breast lesions.
    Flamm CR; Ziegler KM; Aronson N
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jun; 2(6):485-7. PubMed ID: 17411864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interventional breast imaging: current procedures and assessing for concordance with pathology.
    Bassett LW; Mahoney MC; Apple SK
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):881-94, vii. PubMed ID: 17888775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Management of non-malignant results in core needle biopsy of breast lesions].
    Fan ZQ; Ouyang T; Li JF; Wang TF; Xie YT; Fan T; Zhang Z; Lin BY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Sep; 88(34):2387-90. PubMed ID: 19087711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Problem solving MR imaging of the breast.
    Lee CH
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2004 Sep; 42(5):919-34, vii. PubMed ID: 15337425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neurofibroma of the breast in a boy with neurofibromatosis type 1.
    Murat A; Kansiz F; Kabakus N; Kazez A; Ozercan R
    Clin Imaging; 2004; 28(6):415-7. PubMed ID: 15531141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast.
    Cleveland DL; Broussard M
    Radiol Technol; 1995; 67(2):177-80. PubMed ID: 8570848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Effort, accuracy and histology of MR-guided vacuum biopsy of suspicious breast lesions--retrospective evaluation after 389 interventions].
    Fischer U; Schwethelm L; Baum FT; Luftner-Nagel S; Teubner J
    Rofo; 2009 Aug; 181(8):774-81. PubMed ID: 19582655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcome of initially only magnetic resonance mammography-detected findings with and without correlate at second-look sonography: distribution according to patient history of breast cancer and lesion size.
    Linda A; Zuiani C; Londero V; Bazzocchi M
    Breast; 2008 Feb; 17(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 17709249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast improves detection of invasive cancer, preinvasive cancer, and premalignant lesions during surveillance of women at high risk for breast cancer.
    Riedl CC; Ponhold L; Flöry D; Weber M; Kroiss R; Wagner T; Fuchsjäger M; Helbich TH
    Clin Cancer Res; 2007 Oct; 13(20):6144-52. PubMed ID: 17947480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: differential diagnosis of a breast lesion to avoid biopsy.
    Tecnologica MAP Suppl; 2000 Jun; ():7-9. PubMed ID: 11067681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: differential diagnosis of a breast lesion to avoid biopsy.
    Tecnologica MAP Suppl; 2001 Dec; ():30-2. PubMed ID: 11933939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Diagnosis of breast diseases with magnetic resonance tomography].
    Kvistad KA; Gribbestad IS; Haraldseth O; Nilsen G
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 May; 120(12):1451-8. PubMed ID: 10851944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of suspicious nipple discharge by magnetic resonance mammography based on breast imaging reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging descriptors.
    Tokuda Y; Kuriyama K; Nakamoto A; Choi S; Yutani K; Kunitomi Y; Haneda T; Kawai M; Masuda N; Takeda M; Nakamura H
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 19188786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative analysis of core needle biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytology in the evaluation of palpable and mammographically detected suspicious breast lesions.
    Garg S; Mohan H; Bal A; Attri AK; Kochhar S
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Nov; 35(11):681-9. PubMed ID: 17924407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benign breast disease.
    Norris TG
    Radiol Technol; 2001; 72(3):245-67; quiz 268-71, 243. PubMed ID: 11214435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Large-core needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration biopsy in solid breast lesions: comparison of costs and diagnostic value.
    Vimpeli SM; Saarenmaa I; Huhtala H; Soimakallio S
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Oct; 49(8):863-9. PubMed ID: 18618302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Questioning minimum screening mammography reading workload, and MRI assessment of breast microcalcifications.
    Ciatto S
    Breast; 2006 Aug; 15(4):461-3. PubMed ID: 16737815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic resonance findings in women at high risk for developing breast cancer: an Australian feasibility study.
    Peters G; Anderson J; Longman G; Thomson J; Taylor D; Bennett M; Wylie E; Goldblatt J; Chan A; Saunders C
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Feb; 52(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 18373823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The triple diagnosis of breast diseases].
    Deliĭski T; Baĭchev G; Dikov D; Todorova A; Gorchev G
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1998; 37(4):33-4. PubMed ID: 10360052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.