126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17412021)
1. Optimizing the interpretation of CT for appendicitis: modeling health utilities for clinical practice.
Blackmore CC; Terasawa T
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Feb; 3(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 17412021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnosis of acute appendicitis with sliding slab ray-sum interpretation of low-dose unenhanced CT and standard-dose i.v. contrast-enhanced CT scans.
Seo H; Lee KH; Kim HJ; Kim K; Kang SB; Kim SY; Kim YH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 193(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 19542400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Acute appendicitis in young adults: low- versus standard-radiation-dose contrast-enhanced abdominal CT for diagnosis.
Kim SY; Lee KH; Kim K; Kim TY; Lee HS; Hwang SS; Song KJ; Kang HS; Kim YH; Rhee JE
Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):437-45. PubMed ID: 21633052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perforated versus nonperforated acute appendicitis: accuracy of multidetector CT detection.
Bixby SD; Lucey BC; Soto JA; Theysohn JM; Ozonoff A; Varghese JC
Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):780-6. PubMed ID: 17114626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG 2000-compressed chest CT images using mathematical and perceptual quality metrics.
Kim B; Lee KH; Kim KJ; Mantiuk R; Hahn S; Kim TJ; Kim YH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):328-34. PubMed ID: 18212217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The status of appendiceal CT in an urban medical center 5 years after its introduction: experience with 753 patients.
Rhea JT; Halpern EF; Ptak T; Lawrason JN; Sacknoff R; Novelline RA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1802-8. PubMed ID: 15908534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective examination of patients suspected of having appendicitis using new computed tomography criteria including "maximum depth of intraluminal appendiceal fluid greater than 2.6 mm".
Moteki T; Ohya N; Horikoshi H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):383-9. PubMed ID: 19478631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reassessment of CT images to improve diagnostic accuracy in patients with suspected acute appendicitis and an equivocal preoperative CT interpretation.
Kim HC; Yang DM; Kim SW; Park SJ
Eur Radiol; 2012 Jun; 22(6):1178-85. PubMed ID: 22193372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Neutral vs positive oral contrast in diagnosing acute appendicitis with contrast-enhanced CT: sensitivity, specificity, reader confidence and interpretation time.
Naeger DM; Chang SD; Kolli P; Shah V; Huang W; Thoeni RF
Br J Radiol; 2011 May; 84(1001):418-26. PubMed ID: 20959365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Added value of coronal reformations for duty radiologists and for referring physicians or surgeons in the CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
Lee KH; Kim YH; Hahn S; Lee KW; Lee HJ; Kim TJ; Kang SB; Shin JH; Park BJ
Korean J Radiol; 2006; 7(2):87-96. PubMed ID: 16799269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computed tomography diagnosis utilizing compressed image data: an ROC analysis using acute appendicitis as a model.
Megibow AJ; Rusinek H; Lisi V; Bennett GL; Macari M; Israel GM; Krinsky GA
J Digit Imaging; 2002 Jun; 15(2):84-90. PubMed ID: 12297974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can appendiceal CT scanning be utilized effectively in widespread general surgical practice?
McDonough J; Stasik C; Piontkowsky D; Treisman E
Am Surg; 2002 Oct; 68(10):917-21. PubMed ID: 12412726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MDCT with coronal reconstruction: clinical benefit in evaluation of suspected acute appendicitis in pediatric patients.
Kim YJ; Kim JE; Kim HS; Hwang HY
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jan; 192(1):150-2. PubMed ID: 19098194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A novel reporting system to improve accuracy in appendicitis imaging.
Godwin BD; Drake FT; Simianu VV; Shriki JE; Hippe DS; Dighe M; Bastawrous S; Cuevas C; Flum D; Bhargava P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):1212-9. PubMed ID: 26001230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of computed tomography in predicting appendiceal perforation.
Fraser JD; Aguayo P; Sharp SW; Snyder CL; Rivard DC; Cully BE; Sharp RJ; Ostlie DJ; St Peter SD
J Pediatr Surg; 2010 Jan; 45(1):231-4; discussion 234-4. PubMed ID: 20105609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal use of AEC in CT: a literature review.
Gudjónsdóttir J; Ween B; Olsen DR
Radiol Technol; 2010; 81(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 20207787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incidence of acute appendicitis in patients with equivocal CT findings.
Daly CP; Cohan RH; Francis IR; Caoili EM; Ellis JH; Nan B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jun; 184(6):1813-20. PubMed ID: 15908536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Suspected appendicitis in children: rectal and intravenous contrast-enhanced versus intravenous contrast-enhanced CT.
Kharbanda AB; Taylor GA; Bachur RG
Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):520-6. PubMed ID: 17456874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of suspected appendicitis in children and young adults: helical CT.
Sivit CJ; Applegate KE; Berlin SC; Myers MT; Stallion A; Dudgeon DL; Borisa VJ; Morrison SC; Weinert DM; Grisoni ER
Radiology; 2000 Aug; 216(2):430-3. PubMed ID: 10924565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can We Perform CT of the Appendix with Less Than 1 mSv? A De-escalating Dose-simulation Study.
Park JH; Jeon JJ; Lee SS; Dhanantwari AC; Sim JY; Kim HY; Lee KH
Eur Radiol; 2018 May; 28(5):1826-1834. PubMed ID: 29218613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
