471 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17412096)
21. Evaluation of a software package for automated quality assessment of contrast detail images--comparison with subjective visual assessment.
Pascoal A; Lawinski CP; Honey I; Blake P
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5743-57. PubMed ID: 16306665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Review of the new methodology of analyzing receiver operating characteristic curves.
Ikeda M; Ishigaki T; Yamauchi K
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 2():837-40. PubMed ID: 10384578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Visual perception studies and observer models in medical imaging.
Burgess AE
Semin Nucl Med; 2011 Nov; 41(6):419-36. PubMed ID: 21978445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Semi-parametric ROC regression analysis with placement values.
Cai T
Biostatistics; 2004 Jan; 5(1):45-60. PubMed ID: 14744827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A marginal model approach for analysis of multi-reader multi-test receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data.
Song X; Zhou XH
Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):303-12. PubMed ID: 15772108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [ROC-curve analysis. A statistical method for the evaluation of diagnostic tests].
Albeck MJ; Børgesen SE
Ugeskr Laeger; 1990 Jun; 152(23):1650-3. PubMed ID: 2194326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Assessment of diagnostic result for medical image by receiver operating characteristic and forced choice].
Yue X; Ye Y; Deng Z; Jiang D; Zheng C
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 1998 Sep; 15(3):282-5. PubMed ID: 12553254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. ROC, LROC, FROC, AFROC: an alphabet soup.
He X; Frey E
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Sep; 6(9):652-5. PubMed ID: 19720362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Ideal AFROC and FROC observers.
Khurd P; Liu B; Gindi G
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Feb; 29(2):375-86. PubMed ID: 20129845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnostic tests: a statistical review.
Schulzer M
Muscle Nerve; 1994 Jul; 17(7):815-9. PubMed ID: 8008012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of interlaboratory survey date in terms of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) indices.
Hermann GA; Herrera N; Sugiura HT
J Nucl Med; 1982 Jun; 23(6):525-31. PubMed ID: 7077404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The use of the 'binormal' model for parametric ROC analysis of quantitative diagnostic tests.
Hanley JA
Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(14):1575-85. PubMed ID: 8855483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Measuring diagnostic and predictive accuracy in disease management: an introduction to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
Linden A
J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Apr; 12(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 16579821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Three approaches to regression analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous test results.
Pepe MS
Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 9544511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Advanced integrated technique in breast cancer thermography.
Ng EY; Kee EC
J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 17852648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reader variability in mammography and its implications for expected utility over the population of readers and cases.
Wagner RF; Beam CA; Beiden SV
Med Decis Making; 2004; 24(6):561-72. PubMed ID: 15534338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The partial area under the summary ROC curve.
Walter SD
Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of the clinical informativeness of photographs and digital imaging media with multiple-choice receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Perednia DA; Gaines JA; Butruille TW
Arch Dermatol; 1995 Mar; 131(3):292-7. PubMed ID: 7887658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A permutation test sensitive to differences in areas for comparing ROC curves from a paired design.
Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2873-93. PubMed ID: 16134144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
