BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17412097)

  • 1. Measuring observer performance in chest radiology: some experiences.
    Potchen EJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jun; 3(6):423-32. PubMed ID: 17412097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prototype system for enhancement of frontal chest radiographs using eigenimage processing.
    Butler A; Bones P; Hurrell M
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Jun; 52(3):244-53. PubMed ID: 18477119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems.
    Metz CE
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jun; 3(6):413-22. PubMed ID: 17412096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. VIEWDEX: an efficient and easy-to-use software for observer performance studies.
    Håkansson M; Svensson S; Zachrisson S; Svalkvist A; Båth M; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):42-51. PubMed ID: 20200105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology.
    Börjesson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Kheddache S; Svensson S; Tingberg A; Grahn A; Ruschin M; Hemdal B; Mattsson S; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):45-52. PubMed ID: 15933080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. RADIUS--closing the circle on the assessment of imaging performance.
    Moores BM; Mattsson S; Månsson LG; Panzer W; Regulla D; Dance D; Alm Carlsson G; Verdun FR; Buhr E; Hoeschen C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):450-7. PubMed ID: 15933154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of location specific observer performance data: validated extensions of the jackknife free-response (JAFROC) method.
    Chakraborty DP
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1187-93. PubMed ID: 16979067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fractal-feature distance as a substitute for observer performance index in contrast-detail examination.
    Imai K; Ikeda M; Enchi Y; Niimi T
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):541-5. PubMed ID: 17689214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A level crossing enhancement scheme for chest radiograph images.
    Nagesha ; Kumar GH
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Oct; 37(10):1455-60. PubMed ID: 17374367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Errors in radiologic studies].
    Mali WP
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Apr; 146(17):792-3. PubMed ID: 12014235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simultaneous acquisition of dual analyser-based phase contrast X-ray images for small animal imaging.
    Kitchen MJ; Pavlov KM; Hooper SB; Vine DJ; Siu KK; Wallace MJ; Siew ML; Yagi N; Uesugi K; Lewis RA
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Dec; 68(3 Suppl):S49-53. PubMed ID: 18599236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multidetector computed tomography chest examinations with low-kilovoltage protocols in adults: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
    Kim MJ; Park CH; Choi SJ; Hwang KH; Kim HS
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 19478637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Basic principles and postprocessing techniques of dual-energy CT: illustrated by selected congenital abnormalities of the thorax.
    Godoy MC; Naidich DP; Marchiori E; Assadourian B; Leidecker C; Schmidt B; Vlahos I
    J Thorac Imaging; 2009 May; 24(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 19465844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Postmortem imaging of blunt chest trauma using CT and MRI: comparison with autopsy.
    Aghayev E; Christe A; Sonnenschein M; Yen K; Jackowski C; Thali MJ; Dirnhofer R; Vock P
    J Thorac Imaging; 2008 Feb; 23(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 18347515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pairwise comparison versus Likert scale for biomedical image assessment.
    Phelps AS; Naeger DM; Courtier JL; Lambert JW; Marcovici PA; Villanueva-Meyer JE; MacKenzie JD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 25539230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient doses and image quality in digital chest radiology.
    Salát D; Nikodemová D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):147-9. PubMed ID: 18321878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Noise properties of chord-image reconstruction.
    Xia D; Yu L; Sidky EY; Zou Y; Zuo N; Pan X
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(10):1328-44. PubMed ID: 17948724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Diagnostic efficiency on digital snapshots of the standard radiology imaging].
    Campanella N; Antico E; Dini L; Morosini P
    Recenti Prog Med; 2004 Dec; 95(12):566-9. PubMed ID: 15666487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
    Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Guibelalde E; Prieto C; Vano E
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimization of region of interest luminances may enhance radiologists' light adaptation.
    O'Connell NM; Toomey RJ; McEntee M; Ryan J; Stowe J; Adams A; Brennan PC
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Apr; 15(4):488-93. PubMed ID: 18342774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.