80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17412100)
1. Reader variability: what we can learn from computer-aided detection experiments.
Freedman M; Osicka T
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jun; 3(6):446-55. PubMed ID: 17412100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Paradigms of perception in clinical practice.
Jacobson FL; Berlanstein BP; Andriole KP
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jun; 3(6):441-5. PubMed ID: 17412099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. What's the control in studies measuring the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) on observer performance?
Obuchowski NA; Meziane M; Dachman AH; Lieber ML; Mazzone PJ
Acad Radiol; 2010 Jun; 17(6):761-7. PubMed ID: 20457419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CAD algorithms for solid breast masses discrimination: evaluation of the accuracy and interobserver variability.
Wang Y; Jiang S; Wang H; Guo YH; Liu B; Hou Y; Cheng H; Tian J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1273-81. PubMed ID: 20691917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Technology and perception in the 21st-century reading room.
Krupinski EA
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jun; 3(6):433-40. PubMed ID: 17412098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. New opportunities in computer-aided diagnosis: change detection and characterization.
Khorasani R; Erickson BJ; Patriarche J
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jun; 3(6):468-9. PubMed ID: 17412102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of lacunar infarcts on MR images.
Uchiyama Y; Yokoyama R; Ando H; Asano T; Kato H; Yamakawa H; Yamakawa H; Hara T; Iwama T; Hoshi H; Fujita H
Acad Radiol; 2007 Dec; 14(12):1554-61. PubMed ID: 18035284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. VIEWDEX: an efficient and easy-to-use software for observer performance studies.
Håkansson M; Svensson S; Zachrisson S; Svalkvist A; Båth M; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):42-51. PubMed ID: 20200105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of location specific observer performance data: validated extensions of the jackknife free-response (JAFROC) method.
Chakraborty DP
Acad Radiol; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1187-93. PubMed ID: 16979067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differentiation of common large sellar-suprasellar masses effect of artificial neural network on radiologists' diagnosis performance.
Kitajima M; Hirai T; Katsuragawa S; Okuda T; Fukuoka H; Sasao A; Akter M; Awai K; Nakayama Y; Ikeda R; Yamashita Y; Yano S; Kuratsu J; Doi K
Acad Radiol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):313-20. PubMed ID: 19201360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided detection for CT colonography: update 2007.
Bielen D; Kiss G
Abdom Imaging; 2007; 32(5):571-81. PubMed ID: 17690932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. History of research in medical image perception.
Kundel HL
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jun; 3(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 17412094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of image display size on observer performance an assessment of variance components.
Gur D; Klym AH; King JL; Maitz GS; Mello-Thoms C; Rockette HE; Thaete FL
Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):409-13. PubMed ID: 16554219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Heat maps: an aid for data analysis and understanding of ROC CAD experiments.
Freedman MT; Osicka T
Acad Radiol; 2008 Feb; 15(2):249-59. PubMed ID: 18206625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Imaging science and technology in diagnostic radiology: expectations in the second century of Roentgen's discovery of X-rays].
Doi K
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1995 Oct; 55(13):475-86. PubMed ID: 8721341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical MR-mammography: are computer-assisted methods superior to visual or manual measurements for curve type analysis? A systematic approach.
Baltzer PA; Freiberg C; Beger S; Vag T; Dietzel M; Herzog AB; Gajda M; Camara O; Kaiser WA
Acad Radiol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1070-6. PubMed ID: 19523854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computer-aided diagnosis in chest radiography.
Katsuragawa S; Doi K
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2007; 31(4-5):212-23. PubMed ID: 17403598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Addition of the long-axis information to short-axis contours reduces interstudy variability of left-ventricular analysis in cardiac magnetic resonance studies.
Kirschbaum SW; Baks T; Gronenschild EH; Aben JP; Weustink AC; Wielopolski PA; Krestin GP; de Feyter PJ; van Geuns RJ
Invest Radiol; 2008 Jan; 43(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18097271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interobserver variability in assessing segmental function can be reduced by combining visual analysis of CMR cine sequences with corresponding parametric images of myocardial contraction.
Redheuil AB; Kachenoura N; Laporte R; Azarine A; Lyon X; Jolivet O; Frouin F; Mousseaux E
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(6):863-72. PubMed ID: 18066745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
