185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17412213)
1. Re: "Deauthorization: the insidious new payer trick".
Garner DC
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Dec; 3(12):966-8; author reply 968-9. PubMed ID: 17412213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Deauthorization: the insidious new payer trick.
Duszak R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Sep; 3(9):713-5. PubMed ID: 17412155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Economists, weather forecasters, storms, and cliffs.
Borgstede JP
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Sep; 1(9):615-7. PubMed ID: 17411665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Weighing the options. Results unclear in plans for doc payment system.
Daly R
Mod Healthc; 2012 May; 42(20):8-9. PubMed ID: 22670272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medicare update for radiologists: predictions for 2008 and beyond.
Forman HP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jul; 189(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 17579141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medicaid reimbursement developments overshadowed by rate-setting proposals and other state reimbursement trends.
Kemezys KP
Health Law Vigil; 1983 Apr; 6(8):8-11. PubMed ID: 10259090
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Oh, Canada: comparing single-payer health care with practice in the United States.
Shaw JC
Am J Med; 2005 Oct; 118(10):1064-6. PubMed ID: 16194633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. CT colonography and virtual reimbursement.
Duszak R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jul; 1(7):457-8. PubMed ID: 17411633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing PPACA's evolving impact on radiology.
Silva E
J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Nov; 9(11):771-2. PubMed ID: 23122341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. AMA assails proposed Medicare physician payment cuts as 'arbitrary'.
Ritchie A
Med Econ; 2013 Aug; 90(16):54. PubMed ID: 24830092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medicare physician payment reform: changing incentives to maintain access to quality surgical services.
O'Shea JS
J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Jan; 206(1):165-70. PubMed ID: 18155583
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Sorting out the three Rs: RVU, RVS and RBRVS.
Bergey TW
Radiol Manage; 1991; 13(4):35-9. PubMed ID: 10115835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reform of hospital payment system presents a dilemma.
Vignola M
Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1982; 15(4):44-5. PubMed ID: 10298586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Docs unite on cutback. Negative cost-growth target may heal split for now.
Gardner J
Mod Healthc; 1998 Nov; 28(47):44. PubMed ID: 10187696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Resource based relative value scale. Study released by Harvard University.
Colo Med; 1988 Oct; 85(19):405. PubMed ID: 3066566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. As M+C benefits shrink, physicians must weigh options.
Capitation Rates Data; 2003 Jun; 8(6):68-70. PubMed ID: 12856380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Resource based relative value scale study. Answers to your questions provided by the CMS and the AMA.
Colo Med; 1988 Oct; 85(19):406-7. PubMed ID: 3066567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Caps are back: are you provider based? Medicare sets new financial limitations on therapy reimbursements.
Murer CG
Rehab Manag; 2006 Jun; 19(5):46-7. PubMed ID: 16771195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. CMS report offers great indicators for commercial, M+C plans.
Capitation Rates Data; 2003 Jun; 8(6):70-2. PubMed ID: 12856381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. 'Mixed' billing raises questions.
Mazzocco WJ
Adv Nurse Pract; 2000 Oct; 8(10):24-5. PubMed ID: 11761534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
