437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17412256)
1. Quality--a radiology imperative: interpretation accuracy and pertinence.
Lee JK
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Mar; 4(3):162-5. PubMed ID: 17412256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. RADPEER quality assurance program: a multifacility study of interpretive disagreement rates.
Borgstede JP; Lewis RS; Bhargavan M; Sunshine JH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jan; 1(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 17411521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. RADPEER scoring white paper.
Jackson VP; Cushing T; Abujudeh HH; Borgstede JP; Chin KW; Grimes CK; Larson DB; Larson PA; Pyatt RS; Thorwarth WT
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Jan; 6(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 19111267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Disagreement in interpretation: a method for the development of benchmarks for quality assurance in imaging.
Soffa DJ; Lewis RS; Sunshine JH; Bhargavan M
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Mar; 1(3):212-7. PubMed ID: 17411562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Turf wars in radiology: the past, present, and future importance of training standards in imaging.
Rao VM; Levin DC
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jul; 2(7):602-6. PubMed ID: 17411885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quality and variability in diagnostic radiology.
Alpert HR; Hillman BJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Feb; 1(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 17411540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Turf wars in radiology: the quality of interpretations of imaging studies by nonradiologist physicians--a patient safety issue?
Levin DC; Rao VM
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jul; 1(7):506-9. PubMed ID: 17411640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Peer review in diagnostic radiology: current state and a vision for the future.
Mahgerefteh S; Kruskal JB; Yam CS; Blachar A; Sosna J
Radiographics; 2009; 29(5):1221-31. PubMed ID: 19564252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A reference standard-based quality assurance program for radiology.
Liu PT; Johnson CD; Miranda R; Patel MD; Phillips CJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Jan; 7(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 20129274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interrater agreement in the evaluation of discrepant imaging findings with the Radpeer system.
Bender LC; Linnau KF; Meier EN; Anzai Y; Gunn ML
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1320-7. PubMed ID: 23169725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. RADPEER peer review: relevance, use, concerns, challenges, and direction forward.
Abujudeh H; Pyatt RS; Bruno MA; Chetlen AL; Buck D; Hobbs SK; Roth C; Truwit C; Agarwal R; Kennedy ST; Glenn L
J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Sep; 11(9):899-904. PubMed ID: 24842585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of computer databases to reduce radiograph reading errors.
Gutmark R; Halsted MJ; Perry L; Gold G
J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Jan; 4(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 17412226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiology by nonradiologists: is report documentation adequate?
Weiner SN
Am J Manag Care; 2005 Dec; 11(12):781-5. PubMed ID: 16336062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Quality control of outpatient imaging examinations in North Rhine-Westphalia, Part II].
Krug B; Boettge M; Reineke T; Coburger S; Zähringer M; Harnischmacher U; Lüngen M; Lauterbach KW; Lehmacher W; Lackner K
Rofo; 2003 Mar; 175(3):346-60. PubMed ID: 12635011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Quality assurance in diagnostic radiology].
Hodler J
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1995 Jan; 125(3):57-64. PubMed ID: 7846498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Outsourced teleradiology imaging services: an analysis of discordant interpretation in 124,870 cases.
Wong WS; Roubal I; Jackson DB; Paik WN; Wong VK
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Jun; 2(6):478-84. PubMed ID: 17411863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evidence-based radiology: step 3--critical appraisal of diagnostic literature.
Cronin P
Semin Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 44(3):158-65. PubMed ID: 19480899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. What is a good radiologist?
Amis ES
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Mar; 1(3):155. PubMed ID: 17411547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimizing radiology peer review: a mathematical model for selecting future cases based on prior errors.
Sheu YR; Feder E; Balsim I; Levin VF; Bleicher AG; Branstetter BF
J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Jun; 7(6):431-8. PubMed ID: 20522396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiology resident interpretations of on-call imaging studies: the incidence of major discrepancies.
Cooper VF; Goodhartz LA; Nemcek AA; Ryu RK
Acad Radiol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1198-204. PubMed ID: 18692761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
