141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17412647)
1. An adaptive Simon Two-Stage Design for Phase 2 studies of targeted therapies.
Jones CL; Holmgren E
Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Sep; 28(5):654-61. PubMed ID: 17412647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adaptive two-stage designs in phase II clinical trials.
Banerjee A; Tsiatis AA
Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(19):3382-95. PubMed ID: 16479547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimal and minimax three-stage designs for phase II oncology clinical trials.
Chen K; Shan M
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Jan; 29(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17544337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Targeting population entering phase III trials: a new stratified adaptive phase II design.
Tournoux-Facon C; De Rycke Y; Tubert-Bitter P
Stat Med; 2011 Apr; 30(8):801-11. PubMed ID: 21432875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A composite design for transition from a preliminary to a full-scale study.
Lachin JM; Younes N
Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):5014-32. PubMed ID: 17577245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomarker-adaptive threshold design: a procedure for evaluating treatment with possible biomarker-defined subset effect.
Jiang W; Freidlin B; Simon R
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Jul; 99(13):1036-43. PubMed ID: 17596577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adaptive designs for confirmatory clinical trials.
Bretz F; Koenig F; Brannath W; Glimm E; Posch M
Stat Med; 2009 Apr; 28(8):1181-217. PubMed ID: 19206095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A two-stage phase II trial design utilizing both primary and secondary endpoints.
Lin X; Allred R; Andrews G
Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 17252536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Bayesian predictive strategy for an adaptive two-stage design in phase II clinical trials.
Sambucini V
Stat Med; 2010 Jun; 29(13):1430-42. PubMed ID: 20099246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sample size determination for phase II clinical trials based on Bayesian decision theory.
Stallard N
Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):279-94. PubMed ID: 9544522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On Simon's two-stage design for single-arm phase IIA cancer clinical trials under beta-binomial distribution.
Liu J; Lin Y; Shih WJ
Stat Med; 2010 May; 29(10):1084-95. PubMed ID: 20077506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An adjustment for patient heterogeneity in the design of two-stage phase II trials.
Sposto R; Gaynon PS
Stat Med; 2009 Sep; 28(20):2566-79. PubMed ID: 19521973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two-stage designs for dose-finding trials with a biologic endpoint using stepwise tests.
Polley MY; Cheung YK
Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):232-41. PubMed ID: 17573866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Operating characteristics of a Simon two-stage phase II clinical trial design incorporating continuous toxicity monitoring.
Ray HE; Rai SN
Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 22232063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bayesian two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials.
Tan SB; Machin D
Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(19):3407-8. PubMed ID: 16847890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Design and conduct of phase II studies of targeted anticancer therapy: recommendations from the task force on methodology for the development of innovative cancer therapies (MDICT).
Booth CM; Calvert AH; Giaccone G; Lobbezoo MW; Eisenhauer EA; Seymour LK
Eur J Cancer; 2008 Jan; 44(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 17845846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phase II clinical trials in oncology: strengths and limitations of two-stage designs.
Schlesselman JJ; Reis IM
Cancer Invest; 2006; 24(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 16777694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Admissible two-stage designs for phase II cancer clinical trials.
Jung SH; Lee T; Kim K; George SL
Stat Med; 2004 Feb; 23(4):561-9. PubMed ID: 14755389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optimal two-stage randomized multinomial designs for Phase II oncology trials.
Sun LZ; Chen C; Patel K
J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(3):485-93. PubMed ID: 19384690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An analytical approach to assess the predictive value of biomarkers in Phase II decision making.
Nikolakopoulos S; van der Wal WM; Roes KC
J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(5):1106-23. PubMed ID: 23957519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
