BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17412649)

  • 1. Arrested replication fork processing: interplay between checkpoints and recombination.
    Lambert S; Froget B; Carr AM
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):1042-61. PubMed ID: 17412649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interplay of replication checkpoints and repair proteins at stalled replication forks.
    Branzei D; Foiani M
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):994-1003. PubMed ID: 17382606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differential regulation of homologous recombination at DNA breaks and replication forks by the Mrc1 branch of the S-phase checkpoint.
    Alabert C; Bianco JN; Pasero P
    EMBO J; 2009 Apr; 28(8):1131-41. PubMed ID: 19322196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic Evidence for Roles of Yeast Mitotic Cyclins at Single-Stranded Gaps Created by DNA Replication.
    Signon L
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Feb; 8(2):737-752. PubMed ID: 29279302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Checkpoint responses to replication fork barriers.
    Lambert S; Carr AM
    Biochimie; 2005 Jul; 87(7):591-602. PubMed ID: 15989976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phosphorylation of Rad55 on serines 2, 8, and 14 is required for efficient homologous recombination in the recovery of stalled replication forks.
    Herzberg K; Bashkirov VI; Rolfsmeier M; Haghnazari E; McDonald WH; Anderson S; Bashkirova EV; Yates JR; Heyer WD
    Mol Cell Biol; 2006 Nov; 26(22):8396-409. PubMed ID: 16966380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring the roles of Mus81-Eme1/Mms4 at perturbed replication forks.
    Osman F; Whitby MC
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):1004-17. PubMed ID: 17409028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Rad53 signal transduction pathway: Replication fork stabilization, DNA repair, and adaptation.
    Branzei D; Foiani M
    Exp Cell Res; 2006 Aug; 312(14):2654-9. PubMed ID: 16859682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple pathways cooperate to facilitate DNA replication fork progression through alkylated DNA.
    Vázquez MV; Rojas V; Tercero JA
    DNA Repair (Amst); 2008 Oct; 7(10):1693-704. PubMed ID: 18640290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Nucleolytic processing of aberrant replication intermediates by an Exo1-Dna2-Sae2 axis counteracts fork collapse-driven chromosome instability.
    Colosio A; Frattini C; Pellicanò G; Villa-Hernández S; Bermejo R
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Dec; 44(22):10676-10690. PubMed ID: 27672038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Degradation of Mrc1 promotes recombination-mediated restart of stalled replication forks.
    Chaudhury I; Koepp DM
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Mar; 45(5):2558-2570. PubMed ID: 27956499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mrc1 is required for sister chromatid cohesion to aid in recombination repair of spontaneous damage.
    Xu H; Boone C; Klein HL
    Mol Cell Biol; 2004 Aug; 24(16):7082-90. PubMed ID: 15282308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rad53 regulates replication fork restart after DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Szyjka SJ; Aparicio JG; Viggiani CJ; Knott S; Xu W; Tavaré S; Aparicio OM
    Genes Dev; 2008 Jul; 22(14):1906-20. PubMed ID: 18628397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orchestration of the S-phase and DNA damage checkpoint pathways by replication forks from early origins.
    Caldwell JM; Chen Y; Schollaert KL; Theis JF; Babcock GF; Newlon CS; Sanchez Y
    J Cell Biol; 2008 Mar; 180(6):1073-86. PubMed ID: 18347065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiple roles of replication forks in S phase checkpoints: sensors, effectors and targets.
    Pasero P; Shimada K; Duncker BP
    Cell Cycle; 2003; 2(6):568-72. PubMed ID: 14512770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contrasting roles of checkpoint proteins as recombination modulators at Fob1-Ter complexes with or without fork arrest.
    Mohanty BK; Bairwa NK; Bastia D
    Eukaryot Cell; 2009 Apr; 8(4):487-95. PubMed ID: 19234097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relocation of Collapsed Forks to the Nuclear Pore Complex Depends on Sumoylation of DNA Repair Proteins and Permits Rad51 Association.
    Whalen JM; Dhingra N; Wei L; Zhao X; Freudenreich CH
    Cell Rep; 2020 May; 31(6):107635. PubMed ID: 32402281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A single unbranched S-phase DNA damage and replication fork blockage checkpoint pathway.
    Marchetti MA; Kumar S; Hartsuiker E; Maftahi M; Carr AM; Freyer GA; Burhans WC; Huberman JA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 May; 99(11):7472-7. PubMed ID: 12032307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Signaling pathways of replication stress in yeast.
    Pardo B; Crabbé L; Pasero P
    FEMS Yeast Res; 2017 Mar; 17(2):. PubMed ID: 27915243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Checking that replication breakdown is not terminal.
    Carr AM
    Science; 2002 Jul; 297(5581):557-8. PubMed ID: 12142525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.