212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17412649)
21. Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells.
Cotta-Ramusino C; Fachinetti D; Lucca C; Doksani Y; Lopes M; Sogo J; Foiani M
Mol Cell; 2005 Jan; 17(1):153-9. PubMed ID: 15629726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The S-phase checkpoint: targeting the replication fork.
Segurado M; Tercero JA
Biol Cell; 2009 Aug; 101(11):617-27. PubMed ID: 19686094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. PARP is activated at stalled forks to mediate Mre11-dependent replication restart and recombination.
Bryant HE; Petermann E; Schultz N; Jemth AS; Loseva O; Issaeva N; Johansson F; Fernandez S; McGlynn P; Helleday T
EMBO J; 2009 Sep; 28(17):2601-15. PubMed ID: 19629035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Chromatin assembly controls replication fork stability.
Clemente-Ruiz M; Prado F
EMBO Rep; 2009 Jul; 10(7):790-6. PubMed ID: 19465889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Increased genome instability and telomere length in the elg1-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant are regulated by S-phase checkpoints.
Banerjee S; Myung K
Eukaryot Cell; 2004 Dec; 3(6):1557-66. PubMed ID: 15590829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dormant origins and fork protection mechanisms rescue sister forks arrested by transcription.
Brambati A; Zardoni L; Achar YJ; Piccini D; Galanti L; Colosio A; Foiani M; Liberi G
Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Feb; 46(3):1227-1239. PubMed ID: 29059325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. ATR/Mec1: coordinating fork stability and repair.
Friedel AM; Pike BL; Gasser SM
Curr Opin Cell Biol; 2009 Apr; 21(2):237-44. PubMed ID: 19230642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Spatial separation between replisome- and template-induced replication stress signaling.
García-Rodríguez N; Morawska M; Wong RP; Daigaku Y; Ulrich HD
EMBO J; 2018 May; 37(9):. PubMed ID: 29581097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Temporal separation of replication and recombination requires the intra-S checkpoint.
Meister P; Taddei A; Vernis L; Poidevin M; Gasser SM; Baldacci G
J Cell Biol; 2005 Feb; 168(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 15716375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Esc4/Rtt107 and the control of recombination during replication.
Chin JK; Bashkirov VI; Heyer WD; Romesberg FE
DNA Repair (Amst); 2006 May; 5(5):618-28. PubMed ID: 16569515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Maintenance of fork integrity at damaged DNA and natural pause sites.
Tourrière H; Pasero P
DNA Repair (Amst); 2007 Jul; 6(7):900-13. PubMed ID: 17379579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. DNA damage responses and their many interactions with the replication fork.
Andreassen PR; Ho GP; D'Andrea AD
Carcinogenesis; 2006 May; 27(5):883-92. PubMed ID: 16490739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Rad51 replication fork recruitment is required for DNA damage tolerance.
González-Prieto R; Muñoz-Cabello AM; Cabello-Lobato MJ; Prado F
EMBO J; 2013 May; 32(9):1307-21. PubMed ID: 23563117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Damage-induced phosphorylation of Sld3 is important to block late origin firing.
Lopez-Mosqueda J; Maas NL; Jonsson ZO; Defazio-Eli LG; Wohlschlegel J; Toczyski DP
Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7314):479-83. PubMed ID: 20865002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The S-Phase Cyclin Clb5 Promotes rRNA Gene (rDNA) Stability by Maintaining Replication Initiation Efficiency in rDNA.
Goto M; Sasaki M; Kobayashi T
Mol Cell Biol; 2021 Apr; 41(5):. PubMed ID: 33619126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae Chk1p in the response to replication blocks.
Schollaert KL; Poisson JM; Searle JS; Schwanekamp JA; Tomlinson CR; Sanchez Y
Mol Biol Cell; 2004 Sep; 15(9):4051-63. PubMed ID: 15229282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Inhibition of spindle extension through the yeast S phase checkpoint is coupled to replication fork stability and the integrity of centromeric DNA.
Julius J; Peng J; McCulley A; Caridi C; Arnak R; See C; Nugent CI; Feng W; Bachant J
Mol Biol Cell; 2019 Oct; 30(22):2771-2789. PubMed ID: 31509480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Coordinated control of replication and transcription by a SAPK protects genomic integrity.
Duch A; Felipe-Abrio I; Barroso S; Yaakov G; García-Rubio M; Aguilera A; de Nadal E; Posas F
Nature; 2013 Jan; 493(7430):116-9. PubMed ID: 23178807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Regulation of alternative replication bypass pathways at stalled replication forks and its effects on genome stability: a yeast model.
Barbour L; Xiao W
Mutat Res; 2003 Nov; 532(1-2):137-55. PubMed ID: 14643434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions.
Lopes M; Foiani M; Sogo JM
Mol Cell; 2006 Jan; 21(1):15-27. PubMed ID: 16387650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
