BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

46 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17415864)

  • 1. Diagnostic possibilities of the electroexcision and cold knife conization for precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix.
    Zlatkov V; Kostova P; Mihova A; Danon S
    J BUON; 2003; 8(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 17415864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP.
    Mathevet P; Dargent D; Roy M; Beau G
    Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Aug; 54(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 8063242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Our experience with the LEEP/LLETZ technique in the diagnostics and treatment of the precancer lesions of the uterine cervix].
    Zlatkov V; Mikhova A; Kostova P
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2004; 43 Suppl 4():55-8. PubMed ID: 15673016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outpatient loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Can it replace cold knife conization?
    Eduardo AM; Dinh TV; Hannigan EV; Yandell RB; Schnadig VJ
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):729-32. PubMed ID: 8913973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating cervical neoplasia. LEEP as an alternative to cold knife conization.
    Simmons JR; Anderson L; Hernandez E; Heller PB
    J Reprod Med; 1998 Dec; 43(12):1007-13. PubMed ID: 9883402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Double-LEEP Cone Procedure as an Alternative to Cold-Knife Conization in Management of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia.
    Husseinzadeh N; Retting WL
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2000 Apr; 4(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 25950891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Clinical efficacy of a new method for LEEP conization with pistol-shaped electroknife].
    Kovachev S; Nacheva A; Atanassova V; Piperkova N; Kostov I; Vasilev N
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2010; 49(5):20-5. PubMed ID: 21268398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Is the directed biopsy accurate?].
    Zlatkov V; Slavchev B; Mikhova A
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2003; 42(4):17-20. PubMed ID: 14577363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Consequences and treatment of cervical stenoses after laser conization or loop electrosurgical excision].
    Baldauf JJ; Dreyfus M; Wertz JP; Cuénin C; Ritter J; Philippe E
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 9091546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Treatment of precancerous changes of the uterine cervix].
    Zlatkov V
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2002; 41(6):48-52. PubMed ID: 12577506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical morbidity associated with total laparoscopic hysterectomy in women with prior diagnostic excision of the cervix.
    Phongnarisorn C; Srisomboon J
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2007 Aug; 33(4):519-23. PubMed ID: 17688621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fertility-sparing treatment in younger women with adenocarcinoma in situ of the cervix.
    van Hanegem N; Barroilhet LM; Nucci MR; Bernstein M; Feldman S
    Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Jan; 124(1):72-7. PubMed ID: 22030403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the Cervix After Cervical Conization by Transvaginal Elastography.
    Xie M; Zhang X; Yu M; Wang W; Hua K
    J Ultrasound Med; 2018 May; 37(5):1109-1114. PubMed ID: 29044684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Complications, sequellae and outcome of cervical conizations: evaluation of three surgical technics].
    Brun JL; Youbi A; Hocké C
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Oct; 31(6):558-64. PubMed ID: 12407327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk for residual adenocarcinoma in situ or cervical adenocarcinoma in women undergoing loop electrosurgical excision procedure/conization for adenocarcinoma in situ.
    DeSimone CP; Day ME; Dietrich CS; Tovar MM; Modesitt SC
    J Reprod Med; 2011; 56(9-10):376-80. PubMed ID: 22010519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unexpected tumor progression after conization for carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
    Omatsu K; Takeshima N; Matoda M; Nomura H; Umayahara K; Sugiyama Y; Utsugi K; Tanaka H; Akiyama F; Takizawa K
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2012 Jan; 38(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 21917067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A study of diagnostic failure of loop conization in microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix.
    Tseng CJ; Liang CC; Lin CT; Huang KG; Chou HH; Chang TC; Lai CH; Soong YK; Hsueh S
    Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Apr; 73(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 10094886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical conization: cold knife and laser excision in residency training.
    Delmore J; Horbelt DV; Kallail KJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jun; 79(6):1016-9. PubMed ID: 1579298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison between loop diathermy conization and cold-knife conization for management of cervical dysplasia associated with unsatisfactory colposcopy.
    Oyesanya OA; Amerasinghe C; Manning EA
    Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Jul; 50(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 8349168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: an experience with 100 cases.
    Ostör AG; Duncan A; Quinn M; Rome R
    Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Nov; 79(2):207-10. PubMed ID: 11063645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.