253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17416188)
21. [Guardianship law in routine nursing care. Determining mental competence].
Weber M
Pflege Z; 2013 Apr; 66(4):240-2. PubMed ID: 23634553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. "Mind control," "synthetic sanity," "artificial competence," and genuine confusion: legally relevant effects of antipsychotic medication.
Gutheil TG; Appelbaum PS
Hofstra Law Rev; 1983; 12(1):77-120. PubMed ID: 15739272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Forced medication of defendants to achieve trial competency: an update on the law after Sell.
Hilgers K; Ramer P
Georget J Leg Ethics; 2004; 17(4):813-26. PubMed ID: 15685765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Treating competent patients by force: the limits and lessons of Israel's Patient's Rights Act.
Gross ML
J Med Ethics; 2005 Jan; 31(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 15634750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Still stuck in the cuckoo's nest: why do courts continue to rely on antiquated mental illness research?
Davoli JI
Tenn Law Rev; 2002; 69(4):987-1050. PubMed ID: 15295857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Dialysis as coercive treatment].
Steinert T
Psychiatr Prax; 2006 May; 33(4):191-3. PubMed ID: 16729404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Protection of patients or deprivation of freedom: assessing each case individually].
Weber M
Pflege Z; 2007 Feb; 60(2):88-91. PubMed ID: 17343096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Protecting forcibly institutionalized mental patients from unwanted drug therapy: a fourth amendment analysis.
Garcia SA; Batey R
Law Psychol Rev; 1988; 12():1-19. PubMed ID: 11855428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Seeking an answer: questioning the validity of forcible medication to ensure mental competency of those condemned to die.
Stricker BW
McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 32(1):317-40. PubMed ID: 15709265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Mental Health Acts in Canada.
Browne A
Camb Q Healthc Ethics; 2010 Jul; 19(3):290-8. PubMed ID: 20507676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Compulsory treatment of mentaly ill patients - A balancing act between personal injury and failure to render assistance].
Moroder A
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2016 Nov; 141(23):1720-1722. PubMed ID: 27855462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Pressure and coercion in the care for the addicted: ethical perspectives.
Janssens MJ; Van Rooij MF; ten Have HA; Kortmann FA; Van Wijmen FC
J Med Ethics; 2004 Oct; 30(5):453-8. PubMed ID: 15467076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Protecting our mentally ill: a critique of the role of Indiana state courts in protecting involuntarily committed mental patients' right to refuse medication.
Goff ML
Indiana Law J; 2001; 76(4):983-1000. PubMed ID: 12455521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Steel traps and unattainable aspirations: a comment on Kress.
Morse SJ
Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(4):599-606. PubMed ID: 16883614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Involuntary placement and coercive treatment in Germany. Subtle differences within the legal framework].
Falkenbach M; Jäger M; Neumann NU; Frasch K
Psychiatr Prax; 2009 Mar; 36(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 18726843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Incompetence, treatment refusal, and hospitalization.
Beck JC; Parry JW
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1992; 20(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 1421557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Forcible medication and personal autonomy: the case of Charles Thomas Sell.
Quinlan M
Boston Univ Law Rev; 2004 Feb; 84(1):275-99. PubMed ID: 16211756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Restored to health to be put to death: reconciling the legal and ethical dilemmas of medicating to execute in Singleton v. Norris.
Hensl KB
Villanova Law Rev; 2004; 49(2):291-328. PubMed ID: 16485377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
Winick BJ
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Substituted judgement and the right to refuse shock treatment in Washington: In re Schuoler.
Marshall GS
Univ Puget Sound Law Rev; 1987; 11(1):167-92. PubMed ID: 16998979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
