31 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17416305)
1. Piston-driven automated liquid handlers.
Schuster J; Kamuju V; Zhou J; Mathaes R
SLAS Technol; 2024 Jun; 29(3):100128. PubMed ID: 38508238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Surreptitious pipetting errors on a vendor-programmed liquid handler.
Britt-Rodriquez K; Daniel J; Hayden J
J Mass Spectrom Adv Clin Lab; 2024 Aug; 33():1-3. PubMed ID: 38827642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Precise Dispensing Technology Using Electroformed Tubes for Micro-Volume Blood Diagnosis.
Ando T; Hirano M; Ishige Y; Adachi S
IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med; 2018; 6():2800506. PubMed ID: 30042905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated Gravimetric Calibration to Optimize the Accuracy and Precision of TECAN Freedom EVO Liquid Handler.
Bessemans L; Jully V; de Raikem C; Albanese M; Moniotte N; Silversmet P; Lemoine D
J Lab Autom; 2016 Oct; 21(5):693-705. PubMed ID: 26905719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization and application of median filter corrections to relieve diverse spatial patterns in microtiter plate data.
Bushway PJ; Azimi B; Heynen-Genel S
J Biomol Screen; 2011 Oct; 16(9):1068-80. PubMed ID: 21900202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robotic liquid handling and automation in epigenetics.
Gaisford W
J Lab Autom; 2012 Oct; 17(5):327-9. PubMed ID: 22933618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Liquid handling with mechanical pipettes].
Nejime T
Rinsho Byori; 2005 Jan; 53(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 15724490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Critical steps in electronic volume quantification of gingival crevicular fluid: the potential impact of evaporation, fluid retention, local conditions and repeated measurements.
Tözüm TF; Hatipoğlu H; Yamalik N; Gürsel M; Alptekin NO; Ataoğlu T; Marakoğlu I; Gürsoy UK; Eratalay K
J Periodontal Res; 2004 Oct; 39(5):344-57. PubMed ID: 15324356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Verifying liquid-handler performance for complex or nonaqueous reagents: a new approach.
Albert KJ; Bradshaw JT; Knaide TR; Rogers AL
Clin Lab Med; 2007 Mar; 27(1):123-38. PubMed ID: 17416306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An improved method for checking HTS/uHTS liquid-handling systems.
Rhode H; Schulze M; Renard S; Zimmermann P; Moore T; Cumme GA; Horn A
J Biomol Screen; 2004 Dec; 9(8):726-33. PubMed ID: 15634800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Strategies to minimize variability and bias associated with manual pipetting in ligand binding assays to assure data quality of protein therapeutic quantification.
Pandya K; Ray CA; Brunner L; Wang J; Lee JW; DeSilva B
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2010 Nov; 53(3):623-30. PubMed ID: 20483557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance evaluation of salivary amylase activity monitor.
Yamaguchi M; Kanemori T; Kanemaru M; Takai N; Mizuno Y; Yoshida H
Biosens Bioelectron; 2004 Oct; 20(3):491-7. PubMed ID: 15494230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of a dual dye photometric calibration method to identify possible sample dilution from an automated multichannel liquid-handling system.
Dong H; Ouyang Z; Liu J; Jemal M
Clin Lab Med; 2007 Mar; 27(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 17416305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
