231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17416469)
1. Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent schedules: effects of reinforcement amount.
Maguire DR; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
Behav Processes; 2007 Jun; 75(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 17416469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent schedules: effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement amount.
Maguire DR; Rodewald AM; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 19429218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rapid acquisition in concurrent chains: effects of initial-link duration.
Christensen DR; Grace RC
Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):217-23. PubMed ID: 18304759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Response allocation in a rapid-acquisition concurrent-chains procedure: effects of overall terminal-link duration.
Christensen DR; Grace RC
Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 19429217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Human performance on a two-alternative rapid-acquisition choice task.
Lie C; Harper DN; Hunt M
Behav Processes; 2009 Jun; 81(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 19015013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the joint control of preference by time and reinforcer-ratio variation.
Davison M; Cowie S; Elliffe D
Behav Processes; 2013 May; 95():100-12. PubMed ID: 23410902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Steady-state choice between four alternatives obeys the constant-ratio rule.
Bensemann J; Lobb B; Podlesnik CA; Elliffe D
J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Jul; 104(1):7-19. PubMed ID: 25989016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gestational exposure to methylmercury retards choice in transition in aging rats.
Newland MC; Reile PA; Langston JL
Neurotoxicol Teratol; 2004; 26(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 15019952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The matching law and effects of reinforcer rate and magnitude on choice in transition.
Kyonka EG
Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 18243576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.
McLean AP; Blampied NM
J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan; 75(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 11256865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Choosing among multiple alternatives: Relative and overall reinforcer rates.
Beeby E; Alsop B
J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):204-222. PubMed ID: 28758210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Concurrent schedules: short- and long-term effects of reinforcers.
Landon J; Davison M; Elliffe D
J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 May; 77(3):257-71. PubMed ID: 12083679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reinforcement omission in concurrent fixed-interval and random-interval schedules.
Ishii T; Sakagami T
Behav Processes; 2007 Mar; 74(3):334-41. PubMed ID: 17275211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.
Davison M; Baum WM
J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jul; 80(1):95-129. PubMed ID: 13677611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preference reversal between impulsive and self-control choice.
Beeby E; White KG
J Exp Anal Behav; 2013 May; 99(3):260-76. PubMed ID: 23440893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Choice in a variable environment: effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement.
Rodewald AM; Hughes CE; Pitts RC
Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):460-4. PubMed ID: 20188157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Local preference in concurrent schedules: the effects of reinforcer sequences.
Krägeloh CU; Davison M; Elliffe DM
J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 16156136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Economic context and pigeons' risk-taking: an integrative approach.
Goldshmidt JN; Fantino E
Behav Processes; 2004 Feb; 65(2):133-54. PubMed ID: 15222962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Choice in a variable environment: every reinforcer counts.
Davison M; Baum WM
J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jul; 74(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 10966094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variable-ratio versus variable-interval schedules: response rate, resistance to change, and preference.
Nevin JA; Randolph ; Holland S; McLean AP
J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jul; 76(1):43-74. PubMed ID: 11516115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
