These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17416469)

  • 41. Amount-dependent temporal discounting?
    Ong EL; White KG
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):201-12. PubMed ID: 15157973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effects of reinforcer magnitude on responding under differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedules of rats and pigeons.
    Doughty AH; Richards JB
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Jul; 78(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 12144310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Concurrent schedules: undermatching and control by previous experimental conditions.
    Davison MC; Hunter IW
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Sep; 32(2):233-44. PubMed ID: 501273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Psychological distance to reward: equating the number of stimulus and response segments.
    Doughty AH; Meginley ME; Doughty SS; Lattal KA
    Behav Processes; 2004 May; 66(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 15110910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Does the terminal-link effect depend on duration or reinforcement rate?
    Grace RC; Bragason O
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jul; 67(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 15182927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Choice between delayed reinforcers and fixed-ratio schedules requiring forceful responding.
    Mazur JE; Kralik JD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Jan; 53(1):175-87. PubMed ID: 2299287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Humans' choice in a self-control choice situation: sensitivity to reinforcer amount, reinforcer delay, and overall reinforcement density.
    Ito M; Nakamura K
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1998 Jan; 69(1):87-102. PubMed ID: 9465415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Varying reinforcer duration produces behavioral interactions during multiple schedules.
    McSweeney FK; Murphy ES; Kowal BP
    Behav Processes; 2004 May; 66(2):83-100. PubMed ID: 15110911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Response persistence under variable-time schedules following immediate and unsignalled delayed reinforcement.
    Doughty AH; Lattal KA
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2003 Aug; 56(3):267-77. PubMed ID: 12881162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of methylphenidate on sensitivity to reinforcement delay and to reinforcement amount in pigeons: Implications for impulsive choice.
    Pitts RC; Cummings CW; Cummings C; Woodcock RL; Hughes CE
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2016 Dec; 24(6):464-476. PubMed ID: 27668767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Choice in a variable environment: effects of blackout duration and extinction between components.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Jan; 77(1):65-89. PubMed ID: 11831784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Quantitative analyses of methamphetamine's effects on self-control choices: implications for elucidating behavioral mechanisms of drug action.
    Pitts RC; Febbo SM
    Behav Processes; 2004 Jun; 66(3):213-33. PubMed ID: 15157974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Choice, changing over, and reinforcement delays.
    Shahan TA; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Nov; 74(3):311-30. PubMed ID: 11218228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Resistance to extinction, generalization decrement, and conditioned reinforcement.
    Dulaney AE; Bell MC
    Behav Processes; 2008 Jun; 78(2):253-8. PubMed ID: 18243577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Rapid acquisition of bias in signal detection: dynamics of effective reinforcement allocation.
    Hutsell BA; Jacobs EA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Jan; 97(1):29-49. PubMed ID: 22287803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Concurrent-schedule performance in transition: changeover delays and signaled reinforcer ratios.
    Krägeloh CU; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jan; 79(1):87-109. PubMed ID: 12696743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Concurrent variable-interval variable-ratio schedules in a dynamic choice environment.
    Bell MC; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Nov; 108(3):367-397. PubMed ID: 29110297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Reinforcer-ratio variation and its effects on rate of adaptation.
    Landon J; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Mar; 75(2):207-34. PubMed ID: 11394487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effects of reinforcer magnitude and alternative reinforcer delay on preference for alcohol during a multiple-choice procedure.
    Benson TA; Little CS; Henslee AM; Correia CJ
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2009 Feb; 100(1-2):161-3. PubMed ID: 19013028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Determination of a behavioral transfer function: White-noise analysis of session-to-session response-ratio dynamics on concurrent VI VI schedules.
    Hunter I; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1985 Jan; 43(1):43-59. PubMed ID: 16812406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.