These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17416835)
1. Histogram analysis versus region of interest analysis of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging data in the grading of cerebral gliomas. Law M; Young R; Babb J; Pollack E; Johnson G AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Apr; 28(4):761-6. PubMed ID: 17416835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of region-of-interest analysis with three different histogram analysis methods in the determination of perfusion metrics in patients with brain gliomas. Young R; Babb J; Law M; Pollack E; Johnson G J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):1053-63. PubMed ID: 17896374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing perfusion metrics obtained from a single compartment versus pharmacokinetic modeling methods using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with glioma grade. Law M; Young R; Babb J; Rad M; Sasaki T; Zagzag D; Johnson G AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2006 Oct; 27(9):1975-82. PubMed ID: 17032878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging for glioma grading: Preliminary comparison of vessel compartment and permeability parameters using hotspot and histogram analysis. Santarosa C; Castellano A; Conte GM; Cadioli M; Iadanza A; Terreni MR; Franzin A; Bello L; Caulo M; Falini A; Anzalone N Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1147-56. PubMed ID: 27161065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of cerebral blood volume and vascular permeability from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with glioma grade. Law M; Yang S; Babb JS; Knopp EA; Golfinos JG; Zagzag D; Johnson G AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2004 May; 25(5):746-55. PubMed ID: 15140713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measurements of diagnostic examination performance and correlation analysis using microvascular leakage, cerebral blood volume, and blood flow derived from 3T dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging in glial tumor grading. Server A; Graff BA; Orheim TE; Schellhorn T; Josefsen R; Gadmar ØB; Nakstad PH Neuroradiology; 2011 Jun; 53(6):435-47. PubMed ID: 20857284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perfusion MRI (dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging) with different measurement approaches for the evaluation of blood flow and blood volume in human gliomas. Thomsen H; Steffensen E; Larsson EM Acta Radiol; 2012 Feb; 53(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 22114021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Histogram analysis of MR imaging-derived cerebral blood volume maps: combined glioma grading and identification of low-grade oligodendroglial subtypes. Emblem KE; Scheie D; Due-Tonnessen P; Nedregaard B; Nome T; Hald JK; Beiske K; Meling TR; Bjornerud A AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2008 Oct; 29(9):1664-70. PubMed ID: 18583405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assesment of perfusion in glial tumors with arterial spin labeling; comparison with dynamic susceptibility contrast method. Cebeci H; Aydin O; Ozturk-Isik E; Gumus C; Inecikli F; Bekar A; Kocaeli H; Hakyemez B Eur J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 83(10):1914-9. PubMed ID: 25087109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relative cerebral blood volume from dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion in the grading of pediatric primary brain tumors. Ho CY; Cardinal JS; Kamer AP; Kralik SF Neuroradiology; 2015 Mar; 57(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 25504266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Glioma grading: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of perfusion MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging compared with conventional MR imaging. Law M; Yang S; Wang H; Babb JS; Johnson G; Cha S; Knopp EA; Zagzag D AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003; 24(10):1989-98. PubMed ID: 14625221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gliomas: application of cumulative histogram analysis of normalized cerebral blood volume on 3 T MRI to tumor grading. Kim H; Choi SH; Kim JH; Ryoo I; Kim SC; Yeom JA; Shin H; Jung SC; Lee AL; Yun TJ; Park CK; Sohn CH; Park SH PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e63462. PubMed ID: 23704910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Paradoxical perfusion metrics of high-grade gliomas with an oligodendroglioma component: quantitative analysis of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging. Sunwoo L; Choi SH; Yoo RE; Kang KM; Yun TJ; Kim TM; Lee SH; Park CK; Kim JH; Park SW; Sohn CH; Won JK; Park SH; Kim IH Neuroradiology; 2015 Nov; 57(11):1111-20. PubMed ID: 26232204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Discrimination between glioma grades II and III in suspected low-grade gliomas using dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging: a histogram analysis approach. Falk A; Fahlström M; Rostrup E; Berntsson S; Zetterling M; Morell A; Larsson HB; Smits A; Larsson EM Neuroradiology; 2014 Dec; 56(12):1031-8. PubMed ID: 25204450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation between cerebral blood volume measurements by perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and two-year progression-free survival in gliomas. Spampinato MV; Schiarelli C; Cianfoni A; Giglio P; Welsh CT; Bisdas S; Rumboldt Z Neuroradiol J; 2013 Aug; 26(4):385-95. PubMed ID: 24007727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantification of blood flow in brain tumors: comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Warmuth C; Gunther M; Zimmer C Radiology; 2003 Aug; 228(2):523-32. PubMed ID: 12819338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative study of pulsed-continuous arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging by histogram analysis in evaluation of glial tumors. Arisawa A; Watanabe Y; Tanaka H; Takahashi H; Matsuo C; Fujiwara T; Fujiwara M; Fujimoto Y; Tomiyama N Neuroradiology; 2018 Jun; 60(6):599-608. PubMed ID: 29705876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Semiquantitative assessment of intratumoral susceptibility signals using non-contrast-enhanced high-field high-resolution susceptibility-weighted imaging in patients with gliomas: comparison with MR perfusion imaging. Park MJ; Kim HS; Jahng GH; Ryu CW; Park SM; Kim SY AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2009 Aug; 30(7):1402-8. PubMed ID: 19369602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Glioma grading: sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of diffusion and perfusion imaging. Arvinda HR; Kesavadas C; Sarma PS; Thomas B; Radhakrishnan VV; Gupta AK; Kapilamoorthy TR; Nair S J Neurooncol; 2009 Aug; 94(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 19229590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]