These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1741689)

  • 1. In vitro hemodynamic analysis of flexible artificial ventricles.
    Chandran KB; Lee CS; Shipkowitz T; Chen LD; Yu LS; Wurzel D
    Artif Organs; 1991 Oct; 15(5):420-6. PubMed ID: 1741689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The hemodynamic effects of mechanical prosthetic valve type and orientation on fluid mechanical energy loss and pressure drop in in vitro models of ventricular hypertrophy.
    Travis BR; Heinrich RS; Ensley AE; Gibson DE; Hashim S; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 May; 7(3):345-54. PubMed ID: 9651851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new design for polyurethane heart valves.
    Butterfield M; Wheatley DJ; Williams DF; Fisher J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 11206756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In-vitro hemodynamics of stented bioprosthetic heart valves in the tilted implantation position.
    Babin-Ebell J; Sievers HH; Misfeld M; Runge M; Vogt PR; Scharfschwerdt M
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Sep; 17(5):566-70. PubMed ID: 18980091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of valve holder flexibility on cavitation initiation with mechanical heart valve prostheses: an in vitro study.
    Lee CS; Aluri S; Chandran KB
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):104-13. PubMed ID: 8834733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transient pressure at closing of a monoleaflet mechanical heart valve prosthesis: mounting compliance effect.
    Wu ZJ; Gao BZ; Hwang NH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1995 Sep; 4(5):553-67. PubMed ID: 8581200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flow visualization techniques in a mock ventricle supported by a nonpulsatile left ventricular assist device.
    Khalil HA; Metcalfe RW; Kleis SJ; Lee EL; Gilbert NL; Kerr DT; Frazier OH; Cohn WE
    ASAIO J; 2009; 55(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 19512887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An artificial right ventricle for failing fontan: in vitro and computational study.
    Lacour-Gayet FG; Lanning CJ; Stoica S; Wang R; Rech BA; Goldberg S; Shandas R
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 88(1):170-6. PubMed ID: 19559219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Harvested porcine mitral xenograft fixation: impact on fluid dynamic performance.
    Jensen MO; Lemmon JD; Gessaghi VC; Conrad CP; Levine RA; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 11206757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hemodynamics of the mitral valve under edge-to-edge repair: an in vitro steady flow study.
    Shi L; He Z
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 May; 131(5):051010. PubMed ID: 19388780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hemodynamic characterization of calcified stenotic human aortic valves before and after treatment with a novel aortic valve repair system.
    Ohashi KL; Culkar J; Riebman JB; Estes M; Constantz BR; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Jul; 13(4):582-92; discussion 592. PubMed ID: 15311864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of ventricular input impedance on the hydrodynamic performance of bioprosthetic aortic roots in vitro.
    Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Walker PG; Watterson KG; Fisher J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Mar; 10(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 11297215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Introduction of a flexible polymeric heart valve prosthesis with special design for aortic position.
    Daebritz SH; Fausten B; Hermanns B; Schroeder J; Groetzner J; Autschbach R; Messmer BJ; Sachweh JS
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 25(6):946-52. PubMed ID: 15144993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new flow model for Doppler ultrasound study of prosthetic heart valves.
    Durand LG; Garcia D; Sakr F; Sava H; Cimon R; Pibarot P; Fenster A; Dumesnil JG
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 10096489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro function and durability of a polyurethane heart valve: material considerations.
    Bernacca GM; Mackay TG; Wheatley DJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Sep; 5(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 8894995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Migration forces of transcatheter aortic valves in patients with noncalcific aortic insufficiency.
    Dwyer HA; Matthews PB; Azadani A; Ge L; Guy TS; Tseng EE
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Nov; 138(5):1227-33. PubMed ID: 19748632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Numerical simulation of steady flow in a two-dimensional total artificial heart model.
    Kim SH; Chandran KB; Chen CJ
    J Biomech Eng; 1992 Nov; 114(4):497-503. PubMed ID: 1487902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Experimental study of the hydrodynamics of polyurethane tricuspid heart valves].
    Sister VG; Iurechko VN
    Med Tekh; 2006; (6):8-14. PubMed ID: 17290919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new self-expanding aortic stent valve with annular fixation: in vitro haemodynamic assessment.
    Vergnat M; Henaine R; Kalejs M; Bommeli S; Ferrari E; Obadia JF; Von Segesser LK
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jun; 35(6):970-5; discussion 975-6. PubMed ID: 19409805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of structural compliance on cavitation threshold measurement of mechanical heart valves.
    Guo GX; Adlparvar P; Howanec M; Roy J; Kafesjian R; Kingsbury C
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Apr; 3 Suppl 1():S77-83; discussion S83-4. PubMed ID: 8061872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.