158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17418317)
1. Measurement uncertainty of the EU methods for microbiological examination of red meat.
Corry JE; Hedges AJ; Jarvis B
Food Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 24(6):652-7. PubMed ID: 17418317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of measurement uncertainty for quantitative methods of analysis: comparative assessment of the precision (uncertainty) of bacterial colony counts.
Jarvis B; Hedges AJ; Corry JE
Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 May; 116(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 17316860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Lessons from the organization of a proficiency testing program in food microbiology by interlaboratory comparison: analytical methods in use, impact of methods on bacterial counts and measurement uncertainty of bacterial counts.
Augustin JC; Carlier V
Food Microbiol; 2006 Feb; 23(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 16942983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance characteristics and estimation of measurement uncertainty of three plating procedures for Campylobacter enumeration in chicken meat.
Habib I; Sampers I; Uyttendaele M; Berkvens D; De Zutter L
Food Microbiol; 2008 Feb; 25(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 17993378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microbiological sampling of swine carcasses: a comparison of data obtained by swabbing with medical gauze and data collected routinely by excision at Swedish abattoirs.
Lindblad M
Int J Food Microbiol; 2007 Sep; 118(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 17706823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of an enumeration method for Listeria monocytogenes at low contamination levels in cold-smoked salmon.
Gnanou Besse N; Beaufort A; Rudelle S; Denis C; Lombard B
Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Jun; 124(3):271-4. PubMed ID: 18456358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Quantitative microbiological analysis--impacting factors as demonstrated with the aerobic plate count].
Fries R
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2004 May; 111(5):188-92. PubMed ID: 15233336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of NMKL method No. 136--Listeria monocytogenes, detection and enumeration in foods and feed.
Loncarevic S; Økland M; Sehic E; Norli HS; Johansson T
Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 May; 124(2):154-63. PubMed ID: 18472176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A critical review of measurement uncertainty in the enumeration of food micro-organisms.
Corry JE; Jarvis B; Passmore S; Hedges A
Food Microbiol; 2007 May; 24(3):230-53. PubMed ID: 17188202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determining the microbiological criteria for lot rejection from the performance objective or food safety objective.
Whiting RC; Rainosek A; Buchanan RL; Miliotis M; Labarre D; Long W; Ruple A; Schaub S
Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Aug; 110(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 16784791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microbiological quality of chicken wings damaged on the farm or in the processing plant.
Malpass MC; Williams AP; Jones DL; Omed HM
Food Microbiol; 2010 Jun; 27(4):521-5. PubMed ID: 20417402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Letter to the editor of the international journal of food microbiology.
Struijk CB; Mossel DA
Int J Food Microbiol; 2005 Mar; 99(1):113-4. PubMed ID: 15718034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The contribution of sampling uncertainty to total measurement uncertainty in the enumeration of microorganisms in foods.
Jarvis B; Hedges AJ; Corry JE
Food Microbiol; 2012 Jun; 30(2):362-71. PubMed ID: 22365349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimates of measurement uncertainty from proficiency testing schemes, internal laboratory quality monitoring and during routine enforcement examination of foods.
Jarvis B; Corry JE; Hedges AJ
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Aug; 103(2):462-7. PubMed ID: 17650207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Suitability of sampling methods for environmental studies in meat rendering and processing plants with European Community licenses].
Louwers J; Klein G
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1994 Nov; 107(11):367-73. PubMed ID: 7872945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of sample preparation and bacterial concentration on Salmonella enterica detection in poultry meat using culture methods and PCR assaying of preenrichment broths.
Kanki M; Sakata J; Taguchi M; Kumeda Y; Ishibashi M; Kawai T; Kawatsu K; Yamasaki W; Inoue K; Miyahara M
Food Microbiol; 2009 Feb; 26(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 19028296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of a Real-Time PCR assay for the specific detection of Brochothrix thermosphacta in fresh and spoiled raw meat.
Pennacchia C; Ercolini D; Villani F
Int J Food Microbiol; 2009 Sep; 134(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 19651454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ring trial among National Reference Laboratories for parasites to detect Trichinella spiralis larvae in pork samples according to the EU directive 2075/2005.
Marucci G; Pezzotti P; Pozio E;
Vet Parasitol; 2009 Feb; 159(3-4):337-40. PubMed ID: 19041183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationships between the density of different indicator organisms on sheep and beef carcasses and in frozen beef and sheep meat.
Jordan D; Phillips D; Sumner J; Morris S; Jenson I
J Appl Microbiol; 2007 Jan; 102(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 17184320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A rapid and reliable alternative to ISO 21528-1:2004 for detection of Enterobacteriaceae.
Joosten H; Marugg J; Stephan R; Klijn A; Jackson T; Iversen C
Int J Food Microbiol; 2008 Jul; 125(3):344-6. PubMed ID: 18547668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
