395 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17418723)
1. Distalization of maxillary molars with the bone-supported pendulum: a clinical study.
Escobar SA; Tellez PA; Moncada CA; Villegas CA; Latorre CM; Oberti G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4):545-9. PubMed ID: 17418723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sagittal, vertical, and transverse changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the pendulum appliance.
Fuziy A; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Janson G; Angelieri F; Pinzan A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):502-10. PubMed ID: 17045150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maxillary molar distalization with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance.
Kircelli BH; Pektaş ZO; Kircelli C
Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):650-9. PubMed ID: 16808573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.
Marure PS; Patil RU; Reddy S; Prakash A; Kshetrimayum N; Shukla R
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(4):331-40. PubMed ID: 27681396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pendulum appliances with 2 anchorage designs: conventional anchorage vs bone anchorage.
Polat-Ozsoy O; Kircelli BH; Arman-Ozçirpici A; Pektaş ZO; Uçkan S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):339.e9-339.e17. PubMed ID: 18331928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Maxillary molar distalization with the indirect Palatal miniscrew for Anchorage and Distalization Appliance (iPANDA).
Suzuki EY; Suzuki B
Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e228-41. PubMed ID: 23646335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of two intraoral molar distalization appliances: distal jet versus pendulum.
Chiu PP; McNamara JA; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Sep; 128(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 16168332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maxillary molar distalization: Pendulum and Fast-Back, comparison between two approaches for Class II malocclusion.
Caprioglio A; Beretta M; Lanteri C
Prog Orthod; 2011; 12(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 21515227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of 2 distalization systems supported by intraosseous screws.
Gelgor IE; Karaman AI; Buyukyilmaz T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Feb; 131(2):161.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17276855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
Angelieri F; Almeida RR; Almeida MR; Fuziy A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):520-7. PubMed ID: 16627178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods.
Bolla E; Muratore F; Carano A; Bowman SJ
Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):481-94. PubMed ID: 12401059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pendulum and modified pendulum appliances for maxillary molar distalization in Class II malocclusion - a systematic review.
Al-Thomali Y; Basha S; Mohamed RN
Acta Odontol Scand; 2017 Aug; 75(6):394-401. PubMed ID: 28502196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraosseous screw-supported upper molar distalization.
Gelgör IE; Büyükyilmaz T; Karaman AI; Dolanmaz D; Kalayci A
Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):838-50. PubMed ID: 15673149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maxillary molar distalization with the dual-force distalizer supported by mini-implants: a clinical study.
Oberti G; Villegas C; Ealo M; Palacio JC; Baccetti T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Mar; 135(3):282.e1-5; discussion 282-3. PubMed ID: 19268824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A
Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anchorage quality of deciduous molars versus premolars for molar distalization with a pendulum appliance.
Kinzinger GS; Gross U; Fritz UB; Diedrich PR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Mar; 127(3):314-23. PubMed ID: 15775946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Unilateral molar distalization with a modified slider.
Sayinsu K; Isik F; Allaf F; Arun T
Eur J Orthod; 2006 Aug; 28(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 16648210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance.
Bussick TJ; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 10715093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraoral maxillary molar distalization.
Karlsson I; Bondemark L
Angle Orthod; 2006 Nov; 76(6):923-9. PubMed ID: 17090171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
