These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17420745)

  • 1. The global stem cell patent landscape: implications for efficient technology transfer and commercial development.
    Bergman K; Graff GD
    Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Apr; 25(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 17420745
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bungled law threatens Italian tech transfer.
    Meldolesi A
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Nov; 19(11):996-7. PubMed ID: 11689829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patenting pluripotence: the next battle for stem cell intellectual property.
    Vrtovec KT; Scott CT
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Apr; 26(4):393-5. PubMed ID: 18392018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Green patents corralled.
    Schiermeier Q
    Nature; 2010 May; 465(7294):21. PubMed ID: 20445600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Burning bridges.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2007 Jan; 25(1):2. PubMed ID: 17211373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The stem cell patent landscape as relevant to cancer vaccines.
    Wang SJ
    Hum Vaccin; 2011 Oct; 7(10):1100-8. PubMed ID: 21957493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The gatekeepers of hES cell products.
    Rabin S
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Jul; 23(7):817-9. PubMed ID: 16003363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Global biotech expansion taking cues from Bayh-Dole.
    Howard K
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Jul; 22(7):919-20. PubMed ID: 15259190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. DNA-based patents: an empirical analysis.
    Mills AE; Tereskerz P
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Sep; 26(9):993-5. PubMed ID: 18779808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patenting the obvious?
    Check E
    Nature; 2007 May; 447(7140):16-7. PubMed ID: 17476235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Technology licensing: lessons from the US experience.
    Sobolski GK; Barton JH; Emanuel EJ
    JAMA; 2005 Dec; 294(24):3137-40. PubMed ID: 16380596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. European patent office's stem-cell decision.
    Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2009 Jan; 8(1):12. PubMed ID: 19116622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The technology trap.
    Gewin V
    Nature; 2005 Oct; 437(7061):948-9. PubMed ID: 16222269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nurses making a difference: the process of technology transfer.
    Johnson VY; Walsh EG
    J Neurosci Nurs; 2005 Oct; 37(5):289-92. PubMed ID: 16379136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patenting of stem cells.
    Williams G
    Regen Med; 2006 Sep; 1(5):697-703. PubMed ID: 17465737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bench to bedside: integrating advances in basic science into daily clinical practice.
    McGoldrick RB; Hui K; Chang J
    Hand Clin; 2014 Aug; 30(3):305-17, vi. PubMed ID: 25066849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patents and technology transfer in CRISPR technology.
    Grobler L; Suleman E; Thimiri Govinda Raj DB
    Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci; 2021; 180():153-182. PubMed ID: 33934836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mothers of invention?
    Marris E
    Nature; 2006 Aug; 442(7106):973. PubMed ID: 16943814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recent Supreme Court decisions and licensing power.
    Giordano-Coltart J; Calkins CW
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 26(2):183-5. PubMed ID: 18259170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mayo and the mouse.
    Younkin SG; Stoddard S
    Nature; 2000 Apr; 404(6780):809. PubMed ID: 10786769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.