These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1742124)

  • 61. Problems in radiographic detection and diagnosis of lung cancer.
    Hayabuchi N; Russell WJ; Murakami J
    Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 2923739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The diagnostic value of grey-scale inversion technique in chest radiography.
    Ledda RE; Silva M; McMichael N; Sartorio C; Branchi C; Milanese G; Nayak SM; Sverzellati N
    Radiol Med; 2022 Mar; 127(3):294-304. PubMed ID: 35041136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Grayscale inversion radiographic view provided improved intra- and inter-observer reliabilities in measuring spinopelvic parameters in asymptomatic adult population.
    Sun W; Zhou J; Qin X; Xu L; Yuan X; Li Y; Qiu Y; Zhu Z
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Oct; 17(1):411. PubMed ID: 27716237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Digital luminescence radiography using a chest phantom. Comparison between radiographs displayed on monitor and hard-copy.
    Kehler M; Albrechtsson U; Arnadóttir E; Ebbesen A; Hochbergs P; Lundin A; Lyttkens K; Kheddache K; Månsson LG; Angelhed JE
    Acta Radiol; 1992 Mar; 33(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 1562402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Digital luminescence radiography using a chest phantom. Comparison between radiographs displayed on monitor at a workstation and at a personal.
    Lyttkens K; Kehler M; Andersson B; Carlsen S; Ebbesen A; Hochbergs P; Strömbäck A
    Acta Radiol; 1993 Sep; 34(5):440-4. PubMed ID: 8369178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Digital chest radiography with a large image intensifier. An ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Månsson LG; Kheddache S; Börjesson J; Mattsson S; Schlossman D
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 9(4):208-13. PubMed ID: 2591385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Evaluation of the image quality of ink-jet printed paper copies of digital chest radiographs as compared with film: a receiver operating characteristic study.
    Lyttkens K; Kirkhorn T; Kehler M; Andersson B; Ebbesen A; Hochbergs P; Jarlman O; Lindberg CG; Holmer NG
    J Digit Imaging; 1994 May; 7(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 8075185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Pitfalls in chest radiographic interpretation: blind spots.
    de Groot PM; Carter BW; Abbott GF; Wu CC
    Semin Roentgenol; 2015 Jul; 50(3):197-209. PubMed ID: 26002240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Efficacy of inverted digital luminescence radiography in evaluating chest neoplasms.
    Kehler M; Albrechtsson U; Andrésdóttir A; Hochbergs P; Lárusdóttir H; Lundin A; Lönntoft M
    Acta Radiol; 1991 Nov; 32(6):442-8. PubMed ID: 1742124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]     [New Search]
    of 4.